Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,642 posts)
14. Infant mortality rates
Thu Aug 21, 2025, 01:47 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Aug 21, 2025, 04:32 PM - Edit history (1)



It was shockingly irresponsible to not couple basic family planning education as part of a public health policy when infant mortality rates fell. That’s not coercion or propaganda.

All it is is a suggestion to put thought into serious decisions over invading your neighbors’ lives and spaces and then blaming them.



There are a few factors which reliably lead to smaller families:
  • ”Empowering” women: When women have a choice, not just about abortion, but about pregnancy in general, they tend to have fewer children.
  • Better health care: When people are reasonably confident that their children will live to adulthood, they tend to have fewer children.
  • Better education. More educated people tend to have fewer children. — This is the underlying social dynamic of The Marching Morons.

"Modern medicine” is a significant contributor to population growth, not just because of a decrease in infant mortality, but also because of an increase in "life expectancy" in general. All other things being equal, as it becomes “normal” for people to live longer, the population will grow.

Without a doubt, a growing human population, especially in the so-called “developed” countries has helped feed this crisis. On the other hand, in retrospect, signs of climate change date back to a time when the world population was much smaller. While we might reasonably say today that the population is far too large, no amount of “family planning” will have a significant impact on the level of greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere or the amount of plastic pollution already in the ecosystem.




Figure from: van Vuuren, D.P., Doelman, J.C., Schmidt Tagomori, I. et al. Exploring pathways for world development within planetary boundaries. Nature 641, 910–916 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08928-w

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»'They're not going to liv...»Reply #14