Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,433 posts)
2. Why not neither? Hydrogen is overwhelmingly made from fossil fuels with exergy destruction of those fuels.
Sun Aug 17, 2025, 08:06 AM
Aug 17

Why on Earth, would anyone advocate for burning more fossil fuels?

Oh I know, for money. No wonder we have all the fossil fuel ads around here trying to rebrand this filth as "green hydrogen."

A Giant Climate Lie: When they're selling hydrogen, what they're really selling is fossil fuels.

Fuel cells rely on fluoropolymers as solid electrolytes, representing one of the most intractable environmental problem on this planet, not that the fossil fuel industry gives a rats ass about the environment. Never have, never will. Fuel cells are even worse than direct combustion of hydrogen, itself an unsupportable, since hydrogen is a dirty fuel.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Hydrogen Engine or Hydrog...»Reply #2