Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

jmowreader

(53,594 posts)

29. The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses...

Reply to ExtraGriz (Reply #6)

Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:38 AM

19 hrs ago

...is that your sensitive data will be on the Dark Web LONG before you can get The Law in there to haul the perp who stole your data off.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time [View all] highplainsdem Yesterday OP

Is this the way of the future? RussBLib Yesterday #1

It's more than a bit dystopian. I just added a paragraph about just how dystopian this might be to the OP. highplainsdem Yesterday #4

Zuckerberg & masking tape Tasmanian Devil Yesterday #2

He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and highplainsdem Yesterday #5

There's a market out there for technology that neutralizes this technology. jls4561 Yesterday #3

1 party consent and 2 party consent.. ExtraGriz Yesterday #6

The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses... jmowreader 19 hrs ago #29

If you use these glasses and give them even johnnyfins Yesterday #7

Why would anyone waste their money on these glasses? Raftergirl Yesterday #8

have you SEEN what people will waste their money on? Skittles Yesterday #10

Yes, unfortunately, Raftergirl Yesterday #14

They shouldn't even be legal in the first place. Karasu Yesterday #16

That's a bit far Polybius 23 hrs ago #22

We'll have to respectfully disagree on that, and I couldn't disagree more. Any potential positives of these things are Karasu 17 hrs ago #34

a pox on everyone who has enabled that POS Zuckerberg Skittles Yesterday #9

They already made that movie. hamsterjill Yesterday #11

How will sensitive info be protected purr-rat beauty Yesterday #12

What could possibly go wrong? Baitball Blogger Yesterday #13

You mean like... jmowreader 19 hrs ago #30

Meta is Palantir levels of evil and shouldn't exist. I have no idea how so many people still justify using their Karasu Yesterday #15

Glasses better have IR ... squiregeek Yesterday #17

If someone shoves those glasses up Elon's rear end Wicked Blue Yesterday #18

I think you meant Zuck Polybius 22 hrs ago #23

All these white billionaires look alike to me Wicked Blue 22 hrs ago #25

Pepper spray to the rescue. twodogsbarking Yesterday #19

Citizens should trademark and/or copyright their faces so that when Zuck uses their likeness they can - in2herbs Yesterday #20

You can't copyright your face jmowreader 19 hrs ago #31

Meta is just a bunch of perverts. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 23 hrs ago #21

Hello Facebook users? luv2fly 22 hrs ago #24

They can F right off with that Bristlecone 22 hrs ago #26

Yet another reason I'm glad I'm a hermit Luciferous 22 hrs ago #27

The unanswered question: Why? Grins 20 hrs ago #28

Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm". LudwigPastorius 18 hrs ago #32

lol, aside from being illegal in many states fujiyamasan 17 hrs ago #33