Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(63,916 posts)
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:26 PM Yesterday

Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time

Source: Gizmodo

Smart glasses ick people out for various reasons, and many have to do with cameras. In response to that ever-growing aversion, companies that make face computers with cameras on them have extended some small but helpful olive branches to people worried about privacy.

-snip-

In Meta's case, though, things may be swinging toward the polar opposite end of the spectrum. According to the Financial Times, Meta is testing prototype smart glasses that record literally everything, all the time. The so-called "super-sensing" glasses would reportedly capture photos "every few seconds," according to sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the Financial Times. The idea here is that Meta's AI glasses could act as a kind of always-on assistant and even remember things about your day like where you left your keys or specific things you said.

At the risk of stating the obvious, that would be a pretty significant escalation in how Meta's smart glasses currently work. Right now, in order to record your surroundings, you have to activate your glasses with your voice or the capture button on the glasses. Once you're taking a picture or a video, an LED indicator lights up on the front of the glasses to show the world that your camera is on.

The Financial Times reports that, with the super-sensing prototype being tested, there is no plan to light up the LED indicator when the glasses are taking photos of the wearer's surroundings. On top of that, there are divergent views within the company on whether the data collected by the glasses should be stored on Meta's servers and used to train its AI. One proposed iteration of super-sensing would collect metadata, but not store pictures themselves, which would be a bit more privacy-friendly but still far from perfect. Metadata in photos, for example, can often contain exact locations, device serial numbers, and more.

-snip-

Read more: https://gizmodo.com/meta-is-toying-with-the-idea-of-smart-glasses-that-record-everything-all-the-time-2000782893



This is not just Zuckerberg "toying with" using anyone dumb enough (or AI-addicted enough or perverted enough) to buy these "super sensing" glasses as mobile spies for Meta on everyone and everything around them. The Financial Times article - https://www.ft.com/content/ac282450-91a8-4597-8f60-9e6ef416865a - says Meta is currently testing a prototype.

And while Gizmodo says there is "no plan to light up the LED indicator" there in fact IS a plan, according to FT, and it is "not to activate the LED when the super-sensing features are being used." FT says their sources say that plan could change, but the current plan and intent is for Meta smart glasses to be spying on everyone and everything all the time.

And the software to do this will be downloaded to existing, already sold, Meta smart glasses.

Zuckerberg reportedly, according to FT, thinks these super sensing smart glasses will replace smartphones. FT quotes him as saying that he wants these glasses to be "a personal agent that's with you all day long, helping you remember things and achieve your goals."

And of course an agent that's also working for Meta and gathering data for Zuckerberg.

I've posted here before about Meta wanting to add a facial recognition feature to its smart glasses, creepy as that is, and in fact secretly downloading software for facial recognition to current smart glasses, without activating that software. That sneaky addition to the pervert glasses was spotted and the backlash caused Meta to remove the facial recognition software (supposedly).

But even if people wearing Meta smart glasses don't have access to facial recognition via AI, Meta will, and there's no reason to believe they won't use it.

Zuckerberg wants everyone who will buy Meta smart glasses to continually spy for him, without even an LED to let people know they're being recorded. Continuous audio recording, every second. Images recorded every few seconds.

EDITING to add that it's very likely Zuckerberg has already discussed the tremendous data-gathering potential of "super sensing" smart glasses with Trump and the Trump regime.
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time (Original Post) highplainsdem Yesterday OP
Is this the way of the future? RussBLib Yesterday #1
It's more than a bit dystopian. I just added a paragraph about just how dystopian this might be to the OP. highplainsdem Yesterday #4
Zuckerberg & masking tape Tasmanian Devil Yesterday #2
He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and highplainsdem Yesterday #5
There's a market out there for technology that neutralizes this technology. jls4561 Yesterday #3
1 party consent and 2 party consent.. ExtraGriz Yesterday #6
The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses... jmowreader 15 hrs ago #29
If you use these glasses and give them even johnnyfins Yesterday #7
Why would anyone waste their money on these glasses? Raftergirl Yesterday #8
have you SEEN what people will waste their money on? Skittles Yesterday #10
Yes, unfortunately, Raftergirl Yesterday #14
They shouldn't even be legal in the first place. Karasu Yesterday #16
That's a bit far Polybius 19 hrs ago #22
We'll have to respectfully disagree on that, and I couldn't disagree more. Any potential positives of these things are Karasu 13 hrs ago #34
a pox on everyone who has enabled that POS Zuckerberg Skittles Yesterday #9
They already made that movie. hamsterjill Yesterday #11
How will sensitive info be protected purr-rat beauty Yesterday #12
What could possibly go wrong? Baitball Blogger Yesterday #13
You mean like... jmowreader 15 hrs ago #30
Meta is Palantir levels of evil and shouldn't exist. I have no idea how so many people still justify using their Karasu Yesterday #15
Glasses better have IR ... squiregeek Yesterday #17
If someone shoves those glasses up Elon's rear end Wicked Blue 23 hrs ago #18
I think you meant Zuck Polybius 19 hrs ago #23
All these white billionaires look alike to me Wicked Blue 18 hrs ago #25
Pepper spray to the rescue. twodogsbarking 23 hrs ago #19
Citizens should trademark and/or copyright their faces so that when Zuck uses their likeness they can - in2herbs 20 hrs ago #20
You can't copyright your face jmowreader 15 hrs ago #31
Meta is just a bunch of perverts. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 19 hrs ago #21
Hello Facebook users? luv2fly 19 hrs ago #24
They can F right off with that Bristlecone 18 hrs ago #26
Yet another reason I'm glad I'm a hermit Luciferous 18 hrs ago #27
The unanswered question: Why? Grins 17 hrs ago #28
Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm". LudwigPastorius 15 hrs ago #32
lol, aside from being illegal in many states fujiyamasan 14 hrs ago #33

highplainsdem

(63,916 posts)
4. It's more than a bit dystopian. I just added a paragraph about just how dystopian this might be to the OP.
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:40 PM
Yesterday

Tasmanian Devil

(297 posts)
2. Zuckerberg & masking tape
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:34 PM
Yesterday

Remember this news? Is Zuckerberg going to allow these glasses into his private and public life?

Mark Zuckerberg Puts Tape Over His Webcam

Eagle-eyed viewers noticed the Facebook CEO has a thin layer of masking tape over his laptop camera and microphone.
https://abcnews.com/Technology/mark-zuckerberg-puts-tape-webcam/story?id=40040340

highplainsdem

(63,916 posts)
5. He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:44 PM
Yesterday

profit from all that data, whether using it on platforms they control, selling it to all sorts of advertisers, or selling it to governments or giving it to governments in exchange for favors.

ExtraGriz

(550 posts)
6. 1 party consent and 2 party consent..
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:55 PM
Yesterday

Maine has a 1 party law, while some states has a 2 party law.... it means in Maine we only need 1 party to record a phone conversation. Some states requires both or all parties in the conversation to give consent.

I'm not sure if people with these glasses need consent in 2 party states before recording videos and audios....???

jmowreader

(53,594 posts)
29. The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses...
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:38 AM
15 hrs ago

...is that your sensitive data will be on the Dark Web LONG before you can get The Law in there to haul the perp who stole your data off.

johnnyfins

(4,194 posts)
7. If you use these glasses and give them even
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:58 PM
Yesterday

More of a window into your private life than they already have, I have zero sympathy for you. All areas of your life will be exploited.

Karasu

(2,433 posts)
34. We'll have to respectfully disagree on that, and I couldn't disagree more. Any potential positives of these things are
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 02:39 AM
13 hrs ago

so outweighed by all the cons that it's not a contest. This shit is the ultimate gift to the fascist surveillance state (why should everyday people need to contribute to this when the technofascist alliance is doing more than enough on that front?) and an absolute wet dream for stalkers and pedophiles. It's fucking absurd.

Meta themselves had stated that they were waiting for a time of great political chaos to release them because they were worried that the political scrutiny might be too great to get away with it otherwise.

Predictably, people on social media are already abusing them, an outcome that took zero effort whatsoever to foresee.

purr-rat beauty

(1,730 posts)
12. How will sensitive info be protected
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 02:13 PM
Yesterday

Imagine someone sneaking these in to record classified or sensitive info. People will try.

jmowreader

(53,594 posts)
30. You mean like...
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:40 AM
15 hrs ago

...the White House Ballroom, Kennedy Center Defacement and Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool debacles will look like mild glitches compared to this?

Karasu

(2,433 posts)
15. Meta is Palantir levels of evil and shouldn't exist. I have no idea how so many people still justify using their
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 03:16 PM
Yesterday

products or platforms outside of forced social media dependency. They've crossed so many red lines just over the last couple years that I can't stand to look at FB or IG posts anymore.

This country is beyond corrupt for allowing this shit to be commercially available or legal in the first place. The founders are rolling in their graves.

squiregeek

(20 posts)
17. Glasses better have IR ...
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 04:24 PM
Yesterday

... because the rectum they will reside in if they get close me is reported to have no sunshine.

in2herbs

(4,699 posts)
20. Citizens should trademark and/or copyright their faces so that when Zuck uses their likeness they can -
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 07:43 PM
20 hrs ago

use this infringement of their rights to sue Zuck.

jmowreader

(53,594 posts)
31. You can't copyright your face
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:42 AM
15 hrs ago

You CAN, however, create an All New And Interesting Makeup Look and copyright that...which of course means that every single American regardless of gender or age will be walking around every day with their faces done.

Bristlecone

(11,282 posts)
26. They can F right off with that
Wed Jul 8, 2026, 09:40 PM
18 hrs ago

a). Privacy invasion

b). They will have copyright infringement cases up the wazoo.

Think of just the movie pirating implications.

LudwigPastorius

(15,327 posts)
32. Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm".
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:54 AM
15 hrs ago

He's been hard at work ever since trying to make that happen.

fujiyamasan

(2,237 posts)
33. lol, aside from being illegal in many states
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 01:52 AM
14 hrs ago

This is another desperate attempt by Zuck to act like he has a strategy to actually grow his company, and to prop up his stock price and create some buzz. The problem is no one is buying either.

Seriously, he lost over $80B on that stupid metaverse thing. He’s spending hundreds of billions on capex, and they dont know what to do with all that compute, so they’re renting some of it out. Maybe the rest would be used for something like this, which would take a mind blowing amount of money (storage, memory, compute). They would never be able to profit off this. There just isn’t enough of a market to monetize this. He’s just throwing more shit at the wall.

Smart glasses appear dead. Google initially tried this over ten years ago. If a company is going to succeed with a product like this, it would be Apple, but aside from the Vision Pro (which also hasn’t sold that well) I’m not seeing much from them. They’re also incredibly smart in not spending nearly as much as the others on AI, and in recent weeks as the market is growing more worried, Apple is really benefiting, and the stock reflects that.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Meta Is Toying With the I...