Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

highplainsdem

(63,929 posts)

5. He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and

Reply to Tasmanian Devil (Reply #2)

Wed Jul 8, 2026, 01:44 PM

Wednesday

profit from all that data, whether using it on platforms they control, selling it to all sorts of advertisers, or selling it to governments or giving it to governments in exchange for favors.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ponietz Crowman2009 SheltieLover

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time [View all] highplainsdem Wednesday OP

Is this the way of the future? RussBLib Wednesday #1

It's more than a bit dystopian. I just added a paragraph about just how dystopian this might be to the OP. highplainsdem Wednesday #4

Zuckerberg & masking tape Tasmanian Devil Wednesday #2

He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and highplainsdem Wednesday #5

There's a market out there for technology that neutralizes this technology. jls4561 Wednesday #3

1 party consent and 2 party consent.. ExtraGriz Wednesday #6

The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses... jmowreader Yesterday #29

If you use these glasses and give them even johnnyfins Wednesday #7

Why would anyone waste their money on these glasses? Raftergirl Wednesday #8

have you SEEN what people will waste their money on? Skittles Wednesday #10

Yes, unfortunately, Raftergirl Wednesday #14

They shouldn't even be legal in the first place. Karasu Wednesday #16

That's a bit far Polybius Wednesday #22

We'll have to respectfully disagree on that, and I couldn't disagree more. Any potential positives of these things are Karasu Yesterday #34

a pox on everyone who has enabled that POS Zuckerberg Skittles Wednesday #9

They already made that movie. hamsterjill Wednesday #11

How will sensitive info be protected purr-rat beauty Wednesday #12

What could possibly go wrong? Baitball Blogger Wednesday #13

You mean like... jmowreader Yesterday #30

Meta is Palantir levels of evil and shouldn't exist. I have no idea how so many people still justify using their Karasu Wednesday #15

Glasses better have IR ... squiregeek Wednesday #17

If someone shoves those glasses up Elon's rear end Wicked Blue Wednesday #18

I think you meant Zuck Polybius Wednesday #23

All these white billionaires look alike to me Wicked Blue Wednesday #25

Pepper spray to the rescue. twodogsbarking Wednesday #19

Citizens should trademark and/or copyright their faces so that when Zuck uses their likeness they can - in2herbs Wednesday #20

You can't copyright your face jmowreader Yesterday #31

Meta is just a bunch of perverts. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Wednesday #21

Hello Facebook users? luv2fly Wednesday #24

They can F right off with that Bristlecone Wednesday #26

Yet another reason I'm glad I'm a hermit Luciferous Wednesday #27

The unanswered question: Why? Grins Wednesday #28

Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm". LudwigPastorius Yesterday #32

lol, aside from being illegal in many states fujiyamasan Yesterday #33