Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

EuterpeThelo

(236 posts)

3. Also

Reply to mdbl (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 29, 2026, 01:12 AM

21 hrs ago

doesn't Jones v Clinton already address this completely!?!? I mean, I know the corrupt six have no respect for precedent and all, but sheesh. That case is what, 30 years old at best?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justices to consider whether to weigh in on $5 million verdict against Trump at at next conference [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Maybe he's right. Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #1

Figures this disgusting not-so-supreme court would hear this case mdbl Yesterday #2

Also EuterpeThelo 21 hrs ago #3

Does Thomas recuse himsself? Du916 17 hrs ago #4