Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,707 posts)
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 06:18 PM 19 hrs ago

Justices to consider whether to weigh in on $5 million verdict against Trump at at next conference

Source: Yahoo! News/SCOTUSBlog

Wed, January 28, 2026 at 5:14 PM EST


When the justices hold their private conference on Friday, Feb. 20, the petitions for review that they are slated to consider will include one from President Donald Trump, asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on the 2023 verdict against him in a civil suit brought by E. Jean Carroll. Trump calls the lawsuit “facially implausible” and “politically motivated”; Carroll urges the court to deny Trump’s petition, telling the justices that the verdict would stand regardless of their ruling.

Carroll, a journalist known for writing a popular advice column for Elle for 27 years, filed her lawsuit in 2022. She alleged that Trump had sexually abused her in a dressing room at a luxury department store in Manhattan in 1996 and that he had defamed her in a 2022 social media post calling her accusations, among other things, a “complete con job” and a “Hoax.” Carroll relied on a New York state law enacted that year, which gave adult victims of sexual abuse one year to sue their abusers, even if it would have otherwise been too late to do so.

In May 2023, a jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and awarded her $5 million. Trump appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which issued an opinion in December 2024 upholding the verdict. In June 2025, the full 2nd Circuit turned down Trump’s request to reconsider the case.

In his petition for review, filed by lawyers from the James Otis Law Group (a firm founded by D. John Sauer, Trump’s solicitor general), Trump stressed that he had “clearly and consistently denied that this supposed incident ever occurred.” He contended that Carroll did not have any evidence to corroborate her accusations, and he argued that she had “waited more than 20 years to falsely accuse Donald Trump, who she politically opposes, until after he became the 45th President, when she could maximize political injury to him and profit for herself.”

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/justices-consider-whether-weigh-5-221423911.html



REFERENCES

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143563087
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143599036
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justices to consider whether to weigh in on $5 million verdict against Trump at at next conference (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago OP
Maybe he's right. Buddyzbuddy 18 hrs ago #1
Figures this disgusting not-so-supreme court would hear this case mdbl 18 hrs ago #2
Also EuterpeThelo 12 hrs ago #3
Does Thomas recuse himsself? Du916 9 hrs ago #4

Buddyzbuddy

(2,254 posts)
1. Maybe he's right.
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 07:14 PM
18 hrs ago

Maybe she plotted to entice him all of those years ago into sexually assaulting her and waiting until he would eventually become President so she could use the opportunity to embarrass him politically. Yeah that seems very plausible.


About as plausible as her wanting some stinking, short fingered, fat orange pig to attack her. You perverted, impotent, imbecile.

mdbl

(8,197 posts)
2. Figures this disgusting not-so-supreme court would hear this case
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 07:23 PM
18 hrs ago

Something they should have rejected outright if they weren't such corrupt a-holes.

EuterpeThelo

(234 posts)
3. Also
Thu Jan 29, 2026, 01:12 AM
12 hrs ago

doesn't Jones v Clinton already address this completely!?!? I mean, I know the corrupt six have no respect for precedent and all, but sheesh. That case is what, 30 years old at best?

Du916

(152 posts)
4. Does Thomas recuse himsself?
Thu Jan 29, 2026, 04:28 AM
9 hrs ago

Given his history with Coke cans and pubic hairs, among other things? He likely has a pre-formed bias that would make it hard for him to remain objective?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justices to consider whet...