Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(164,137 posts)
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 09:15 AM 18 hrs ago

IRS Agents to Review OnlyFans Content to Determine if It's 'Pornographic' [View all]

Source: MEDIAite

Dec 1st, 2025, 11:43 pm


Some IRS agents won’t have to worry about getting in trouble for watching porn at work, because part of their job duties will literally involve reviewing content on OnlyFans and other online creators.

The issue, according to a report by Andrew Duehren at The New York Times, is the interpretation of a restriction on the “no tax on tips” deduction passed as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act that says that tips earned for prostitution or “pornographic activity” are not eligible.

The legislation didn’t offer much additional guidance, and the IRS has yet to issue any statements clarifying what exactly constitutes “pornographic activity,” leaving the taxing agency in a similar boat as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart when he endeavored to define “obscenity” in the 1964 case of Jacobellis v. Ohio: “I know it when I see it.” And apparently, the IRS expects its agents to “know it when they see it” as far as determining eligibility for this deduction.

There are almost five million creator accounts on OnlyFans, reported the Times, but it’s not clear how many of them are Americans and subject to U.S. tax laws, and not all of them are posting pornographic or sexual content. It’s also “unclear,” wrote Duehren, “whether strippers could claim the tips deduction,” because “[t]here is plenty of activity that an accountant or tax lawyer could argue is merely titillating.”

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/irs-agents-to-review-onlyfans-content-to-determine-if-its-pornographic/





How about auditing a couple hundred billionaires and a purported "trillionaire"?
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will they look at Melania's nude photos while they're livetohike 18 hrs ago #1
They hiring? Temp work? Prairie Gates 18 hrs ago #2
😂 underpants 18 hrs ago #4
Epstein. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #3
And... 2MuchNoise 16 hrs ago #20
The Puritans in charge bucolic_frolic 18 hrs ago #5
Trump's probably wasn't lonely bird 18 hrs ago #8
Sesame Street too will be examined. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #6
Especially Bert and Ernie BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #7
Probably the "Donald Grump" character they had in the 80s. They knew. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #9
Those episodes were why after years of GOP threats, he killed the CPB. BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #15
Damn! James48 18 hrs ago #10
Instead of looking for actual tax evasion by the wealthy and corporations ? ChicagoTeamster 17 hrs ago #11
Priorities, priorities. KPN 17 hrs ago #12
Maybe they will see their spouses in the vids. twodogsbarking 17 hrs ago #13
That could make for an awkward moment at the office Christmas party. rubbersole 16 hrs ago #26
Is porn tax-deductible? Asking for a friend. NT mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #14
How much are they making the agents pay? Emrys 17 hrs ago #16
Want to boost your views OF creators? Aviation Pro 17 hrs ago #17
will they be able to publish the guidance Old Crank 17 hrs ago #18
Project 2025 again Nigrum Cattus 16 hrs ago #19
Aren't most of those authors women? FakeNoose 16 hrs ago #22
Porn supports a big portion of the intenet... Wounded Bear 16 hrs ago #21
One 2020 study reported that 12% of websites are dedicated to pornography. ancianita 16 hrs ago #23
Thank you! Botany 16 hrs ago #25
The pornography determination is a fig leaf for yet another attack on women as wage-earners. Efilroft Sul 16 hrs ago #24
Project 2025 was founded and financed by theoretical "Puritans". rubbersole 15 hrs ago #27
One of the funniest threads in a long time! dickthegrouch 14 hrs ago #28
To access some OF content... mwooldri 14 hrs ago #29
Yeah, on OF any "pornographic" content is behind a paywall...nt Wounded Bear 13 hrs ago #30
Maybe. Maybe not. mwooldri 10 hrs ago #32
Free market economics...nt Wounded Bear 8 hrs ago #33
Why? Is the money a site makes different with their clothes off? mdbl 12 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IRS Agents to Review Only...