Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lonestarblue

(13,125 posts)
41. So now millions of people will be forced to go without healthcare because the premiums are too high.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:57 AM
Monday

I do not believe Republicans will ever allow ACA subsidies again. They want to kill the program and have no concerns if people die from lack of medical care. By caving to Republicans, the Democrats prevented some people from starving but consigned others to perhaps dying with no treatment for diseases. Medicaid might help a few, but the Big Ugly Bill cut that also, and red states especially are spending millions to prevent people from getting Medicaid.

We are a dysfunctional country run by oligarchs solely for the benefit of oligarchs.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Literally in tears angrychair Sunday #1
Good luck getting people to vote especially young people vercetti2021 Sunday #14
It's a gut punch, particularly after the momentum of Tuesday. yellow dahlia Sunday #27
Fuck this sucks. Initech Sunday #2
Guess the Farm and Grocery lobbies pulled some strings IbogaProject Sunday #3
And the travel and supply-chain businesses too nitpicked Monday #43
The overly rich again IbogaProject Monday #63
What the "deal" looks like progree Sunday #4
This will also fund Dep of Agriculture Deminpenn Sunday #6
Is a single word of your post to be backed by immediate legislation Bluetus Sunday #7
For the record on Schumer progree Sunday #15
I don't dispute that the 8 traitors knocked Schumer's legs from under him. But that just shows Bluetus Sunday #23
This was not him having his legs knocked out. This was protecting those who have elections coming up. Scrivener7 Monday #53
What??? Makes no sense. Bluetus Monday #55
You're not disagreeing with me. Not sure what you're saying makes no sense. Scrivener7 Monday #73
What doesn't make sense to me is ... Bluetus Monday #83
Yes. Again, we're not disagreeing. Schumer (or someone) wanted this. Rumor is that the airline industry Scrivener7 Monday #84
Agreed Bluetus Monday #87
Schumer orchestrated this chernabogg Sunday #28
They're still playing by outdated norms. Circa 2025, all Dems will feel the heat, regardless. nt Blasphemer Monday #34
In 2020ish, we learned that it only takes 2 assholes to make people hate the entire Dem Party Bluetus Monday #50
Conveniently, all those supporting it are not facing an election soon. Such leadership. Scrivener7 Monday #52
Correct - Schumer Opposes this deal KatyBR Monday #64
Unfortunately he doesn't stand for election until 2028 Bluetus Monday #81
It's my understanding that the 3 individual agency appropriations bills Deminpenn Monday #37
You suspect *WHAT* will pass? Bluetus Monday #51
First thing that came to mind reading the OP... IthinkThereforeIAM Monday #42
All of it is vague promises. Autumn Monday #75
Thune promised a vote? Now saying it will be in Dec. MY ASS! Bengus81 Monday #48
Stupidity squared! lark Monday #49
I feel your pain and your son's Jspur Monday #54
No shit popsdenver Monday #71
I agree with you 100 Jspur Monday #78
I hear you J popsdenver Monday #79
They are definitely going to attempt to destroy the remaining Jspur Monday #82
Schumer aint leading nothing quakerboy Monday #76
Absolutely nauseating. bagimin Sunday #5
It's still four votes short. James48 Sunday #8
What's taking so long? Polybius Sunday #9
Actually, someone else just said the last 4 are Republicans Polybius Sunday #10
Oh no. I'm heartbroken 💔 catrose Sunday #11
59-40 now Polybius Sunday #13
Post removed Post removed Sunday #12
Not a 'bunch' of spineless people, just the 8 dems necessary to pass the bill... Jack Valentino Sunday #17
Na i will vercetti2021 Sunday #18
Disappointed, but it couldn't go on forever... On the bright side, the HOUSE WILL HAVE TO RE-OPEN to Jack Valentino Sunday #16
After the House votes to release the files, is there any commitment that the Senate will pass it? Is there even a 24601 Sunday #21
Fuck no, and no. Volaris Sunday #31
No. And it won't happen. Lucy...... football. Autumn Monday #77
"consideration" berksdem Monday #80
Epic fail. Queso Delicioso Sunday #19
Agreed vercetti2021 Sunday #20
While I agree with that in principle.... AZ8theist Sunday #32
We have that now, apparently Queso Delicioso Monday #59
Still easier to gain influence within the Democratic party than to spin up a viable 3rd party 0rganism Monday #74
Bunch of centrist sellouts blue_jay Sunday #22
None of whom are up for election next year. Sneederbunk Sunday #26
Silver lining manicdem Sunday #24
But SNAP was Dump's hardball negotiation tactic AdamGG Monday #35
Exactly that's what people don't understand Jspur Monday #57
It also damages the argument re: who was to blame for the shutdown FBaggins Monday #58
If it's not SNAP it will be some other core thing that regular people need AdamGG Monday #88
It's over Polybius Sunday #25
ANYONE KNOW popsdenver Monday #72
Sure Polybius Monday #89
Democrats? ArizonaLib Sunday #29
Because they're traitors. Queso Delicioso Monday #60
So basically the deal is OrwellwasRight Sunday #30
No, read the details from AP story Deminpenn Monday #39
What are the details in that which you summarise as just "no" to all OrwellwasRight wrote? (nt) muriel_volestrangler Monday #45
I read the article. And summarized what I read. OrwellwasRight Monday #68
Cue the call for primaries... pecosbob Monday #33
These traitorous senators better have ... flying-skeleton Monday #36
So...starving people, gutting everything, all for nothing. I've been a dem my whole life, pounded pavement, phone airmid Monday #38
I am so sorry :( moonscape Monday #62
I'm sorry 😔 MustLoveBeagles Monday #65
One more positive thing is Deminpenn Monday #40
So now millions of people will be forced to go without healthcare because the premiums are too high. Lonestarblue Monday #41
Exactly ArizonaLib Monday #46
I wonder how close those 8 senators are to lobbyists and is there a correlation Mr. Sparkle Monday #44
Oh he definitely backed this. chernabogg Monday #47
Good points, Welcome to DU ! Mr. Sparkle Monday #69
Been here since 2004 at least. chernabogg Monday #70
Collaboration is now called "breakthrough". Miguelito Loveless Monday #56
I'm not too worried about his. Republicans will renege on any deal anyway. Ray Bruns Monday #61
After hear Mike Johnsons comment about he will NOT commit to bring ACA vote to the floor bluestarone Monday #66
"bipartisan breakthrough", I question that . republianmushroom Monday #67
Bipartisan my dick UT_democrat Monday #85
They own it weissmam Monday #86
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate advances plan to e...»Reply #41