Latest Breaking News

Ilikepurple

(393 posts)

35. SD, thanks for the thoughtful exposition of your opinions on this matter. It is helpful.

Thu Nov 6, 2025, 10:23 PM

Nov 6

I, in fact, did misread, it doesn’t say photos, but refers to something worse whether photos or not. I think my point stands regardless of the form of this “worse” evidence. “ A few GOP house members say they’ve heard from FBI/DOJ contacts that the Epstein files (with copies in different agencies) are worse than Michael Wolff’s description of Epstein photos showing Trump with half naked teenage girls," Shuster wrote.” I do see the needle moving if this is the case and the people have access to the info.
I do agree with your assessments in your reply while being perhaps a little more optimistic if more damaging info gets released. I do think, absent extremely damaging news, that impeachment is off the table. I do hope if released, it’s damaging enough to help weaken the unquestioned support of the Trump administration’s policies by the Republican politicians. Political victory is often a game of inches. I’m hoping the Democratic Party is able to grab some real estate back.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ tells Republicans that Epstein files even worse for Trump than they thought: report [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 6 OP

it's going to take something substantially more 'damaging' than topless photos ... stopdiggin Nov 6 #1

Photos of obviously very young topless girls sitting on leeringly smiling Donald Trump's lap is ho-hum? KPN Nov 6 #2

The story says "several topless young women on his lap" AZJonnie Nov 6 #3

There are numerous reports out on this. Some say KPN Nov 6 #22

TTBOMK, there is one source of this information, and that is what Wolff said in the Daily Beast interview AZJonnie Nov 7 #46

Maybe read the OP. KPN Nov 7 #49

Ummm, well, you are the one who brought up "other reports" which I took to mean NOT the OP AZJonnie Nov 7 #50

That was one of the main things that jumped out at me, too... slightlv Nov 6 #34

Do you see the needle moving on this .. ? stopdiggin Nov 6 #11

There must be some degree of angst or this issue would have disappeared long ago. Ilikepurple Nov 6 #24

couple things 1) the article does not mention 'photos' as the 'worse for Trump' additional material/info stopdiggin Nov 6 #30

SD, thanks for the thoughtful exposition of your opinions on this matter. It is helpful. Ilikepurple Nov 6 #35

the man's crimes are real and manifold - and we grapple with sad realization that we may never see .. stopdiggin Nov 6 #38

Have you ever been to a no kings march? Read the signs bro, every other one says release the Epstein files Blues Heron Nov 6 #29

yes, I have. and I saw literally thousands of signs stopdiggin Nov 6 #32

Just because I don't have a sign doesn't mean I am indifferent to his abuses, or it isn't an issue. 58Sunliner Nov 7 #45

careful, my friend. you run pretty close to smearing and 'personal attack' there stopdiggin Nov 7 #65

Compared to a photo of him with his dick in a 15 year old, yeah kinda. Volaris Nov 6 #13

I'd agree w/ you on that. KPN Nov 6 #18

Nude teenage girls on Trump's lap? kstewart33 Nov 6 #20

The guy was elected the first time after his grab 'em by the p**** comments AND 20 some women AZJonnie Nov 7 #41

I wondered. Thanks for asking the question. yellow dahlia Nov 6 #25

I guess it would depend how young they were Polybius Nov 6 #6

Yes, I agree ... and based on other stuff that has leaked KPN Nov 6 #19

Trump could abuse an infant and the media would still sane-wash it Orrex Nov 6 #21

"...worse for Trump than they thought." OF COURSE THEY ARE! That's what his F-ing persistent dance is about! mpcamb Nov 6 #4

Remember when those Repukes couldn't wait to talk about Bill Clinton's blowjob in the Oval Office? FakeNoose Nov 6 #5

There's 3 unfortunate problems in terms of something actually coming of the existence of said pics AZJonnie Nov 6 #7

what if Trump recruited these girls Skittles Nov 6 #15

Okay, that would be another case AZJonnie Nov 6 #27

think about it Skittles Nov 6 #40

Probably you've seen my theory on this? AZJonnie Nov 7 #42

I think they both had sex with minors Skittles Nov 7 #47

As of now we've heard from about 15 known victims, either in deposition or interview AZJonnie Nov 7 #48

the way he is around young girls Skittles Nov 7 #55

I know a bunch of people who knows what all is in there ... everyone who prosecuted Maxwell AZJonnie Nov 7 #66

Perhaps... 2naSalit Nov 7 #53

it has to be something truly awful Skittles Nov 7 #54

Pretty sure... 2naSalit Nov 7 #57

I think you're 100 percent right BlueKota Nov 7 #63

You're right on all three points however ... FakeNoose Nov 6 #17

Who would this class action suit be "against"? AZJonnie Nov 7 #43

There was going to be a lawsuit against Epstein, but then he died FakeNoose Nov 7 #61

The estate has paid them out to the tune of $125 million to about 150 victims AZJonnie Nov 7 #67

I bet it shows the orange asshole willfully trafficking kids. Javaman Nov 6 #8

now IF in fact - that could be demonstrated ... - - - but there has been no hint ... - - -(nt) stopdiggin Nov 6 #33

as I said, "I bet". nt Javaman Nov 7 #60

Kick and recommend. bronxiteforever Nov 6 #9

It seems increasingly likely NewEnglandAutumn Nov 6 #10

This is the point, not just the photos flamingdem Nov 6 #12

Trump recruited the girls (via the beauty pageants), Ghislaine groomed them, and Epstein trafficked them. TheRickles Nov 6 #14

Melania is implicated too flamingdem Nov 6 #31

Not one known victims is associated with the pageants except for 1, and that was years after the fact AZJonnie Nov 7 #44

most likely he was BOTH Skittles Nov 6 #16

Wait until MAGA finds out that Trump COL Mustard Nov 6 #23

Wait "worse than they thought?" Or worse than Wolffs description? GusBob Nov 6 #26

There may be video of Trump with the 13 year old 'Katie Johnson' as in the lawsuit, mackdaddy Nov 6 #28

I tend to think there's no video, but there were witnesses FakeNoose Nov 6 #36

Pointing and laughing..... Bayard Nov 6 #37

David Shuster doesn't work for Fox News. choie Nov 6 #39

They did use the qualifier "former" in front of the list of networks BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #52

K&R ck4829 Nov 7 #51

Really people Snoopy 7 Nov 7 #56

"There is no more evidence that we can see" BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #59

So let's see the damn files already. mwb970 Nov 7 #58

Open Secrets.... CapnSteve Nov 7 #62

SO LONG AS THE FILES REMAIN SECRET, snot Nov 7 #64