Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,363 posts)
8. Case in point
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:33 AM
Nov 6

For the NJ gubernatorial race, the "early" polling was showing Mikie Sherrill running something like 10% ahead of Jack Ciattarelli. But then as we got closer to the election, the old "trick up the sleeve" was unleashed with the declaration of "But the polls are narrowing now" and "the race is tightening"... It was to the point where some polling outfits had her and him at an almost statistical tie a few days before the election.

The actuals? She beat him by 13%.

With all the elections this past Tuesday, I was duly shocked that the race calls came so quickly after the polls closed because the pollsters were pushing the same narratives of "these races are close" (for many of them), meaning contested results, and a probable long wait for a final "call".

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nate Silver Says Polls Ma...»Reply #8