Last edited Mon Oct 6, 2025, 02:51 PM - Edit history (1)
The convicted sex trafficker invoked Jeffrey Epsteins infamous non-prosecution agreement that barred prosecuting his co-conspirators.
Supreme Court wonât review Ghislaine Maxwellâs appeal, which cited Epstein agreement www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— Minka (@minkab.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T14:35:08.693Z
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/ghislaine-maxwell-appeal-supreme-court-epstein-trump-rcna235391
The Supreme Court declined to review Ghislaine Maxwells appeal, in a rejection that could keep the sex trafficker locked up for another decade if President Donald Trump doesnt grant her clemency.....
The federal Bureau of Prisons lists Maxwells release date as July 17, 2037. The 63-year-old was moved to a minimum-security facility after she had an unusual meeting this summer with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (a former Trump personal lawyer), during which she said she never saw Trump do anything inappropriate. Her conviction followed Epsteins 2019 death in custody while he was being held on his own related charges.
Mondays denial comes amid political fallout from the Trump administrations attempts to fend off intense backlash to its refusal to release all the information it has on the late disgraced financier.
The legal argument in Maxwells petition centered on Epsteins notorious non-prosecution agreement in Florida that said, in part, that the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein. She argued that the agreement should have applied to her New York case. The Trump Justice Department opposed high court review, arguing, among other things, that the agreement wasnt intended to bind districts outside of Florida.
Maxwell had urged the justices to take her case not only to resolve her appeal but also to settle a split among the nations courts about how to interpret such agreements. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers backed her appeal, asking the justices to grant review and resolve the split among the circuits and ensure that defendants and their counsel can rely on the promises made by the United States in its written agreements.