Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bayard

(27,139 posts)
19. Now there's a thought....
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:56 PM
23 hrs ago

If state bars start disciplining federal lawyers.

"Yes, state bars can discipline federal lawyers for violations of state ethical rules while practicing in that state, as the Department of Justice has authorized state bar discipline for government attorneys and state laws govern attorney conduct for all lawyers practicing within their borders. This is reinforced by federal law (28 U.S.C. § 530B), which requires federal attorneys to conform to state ethical rules, similar to private attorneys. While a state bar's attempt to impose exclusive disciplinary jurisdiction over federal attorneys would raise Supremacy Clause issues, reasonable oversight and application of state ethical standards are permissible and expected."

Just the filing of frivolous lawsuits would be huge in numerous states.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pity the grand jury didn't laugh Halligan out of the room. tanyev Yesterday #1
Stupid is as stupid does... SickOfTheOnePct Yesterday #2
Maybe because she has never prosecuted a case would probably be a place to look first. Bengus81 Yesterday #3
Insurance lawyer is a step up from parking garage lawyer. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #6
Which means that no competent prosecutor wanted to go within 100 miles of this case. Bluetus Yesterday #13
There's nothing like on the job training. Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #4
14 of 23 is slim majority and does not portend a 12-0 guilty verdict. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #5
felon must be running out of crooked lawyers Marthe48 Yesterday #7
Seems like the judge is looking at both incompetent prosecution, malicious prosecution, & a doj prosecutor who plays ancianita Yesterday #8
You can indict a ham sandwich with 14 of 23 votes. James48 Yesterday #9
Forgive my ignorance in legal matters, but there seems to be some dishonesty 70sEraVet Yesterday #10
IANAL Bob_in_VA Yesterday #12
Thanks for that, Bob 70sEraVet Yesterday #17
Now there's a thought.... Bayard 23 hrs ago #19
Smells like fraud IbogaProject Yesterday #11
Yeah pretty sure Haaligan is gonna go to jail... SSJVegeta Yesterday #14
Is anyone else old enough to remember . . . AverageOldGuy Yesterday #15
This is the thing.... Dem4life1970 Yesterday #16
I smell a rat and if I were this judge I would be moniss Yesterday #18
Donny hires rank amateurs because he's afraid of those smarter than him. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 22 hrs ago #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge who reviewed James ...»Reply #19