...relative to Halligan.

No experience except being just another Trump boot licker like Habba.

settling for the badly trained.

dumb but really thinks the judge is stupid. I wonder if the judge can just throw out the filing and tell this dumb prosecutor to start over with her fishing expedition.

But it takes a unanimous jury to get a guilty verdict.

How can this exchange be seen as anything other than someone blatantly lying to a judge?
"Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment."
"I only signed the one — the two-count (indictment)"
Then,
"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."
I don't know what happens when a prosecutor lies to a judge. Its not perjury, because the prosecutor is not under oath. But it must do damage to their case.

But my understanding is that an attorney is an officer of the court and as such, lying to the judge has consequences. Fairly substantial consequences. See below

Lawyers who violate their ethical duties as officers of the court may face significant professional and legal consequences.

Disciplinary action: State bar associations investigate complaints of misconduct and can issue sanctions such as:
Private or public reprimands: A formal warning for misconduct.
Suspension: The attorney is prohibited from practicing law for a specified period.
Disbarment: The attorney's license to practice is revoked permanently.
Contempt of court: A judge can impose fines or even jail time for direct acts of disrespect or disobedience, such as making a false statement.
Legal liability: An attorney's misconduct may expose them to civil lawsuits for malpractice from clients who were harmed by their actions.

Lying to judge is considered a violation of their ethical duties.

Would live to see Comey sue her.

If state bars start disciplining federal lawyers.

"Yes, state bars can discipline federal lawyers for violations of state ethical rules while practicing in that state, as the Department of Justice has authorized state bar discipline for government attorneys and state laws govern attorney conduct for all lawyers practicing within their borders. This is reinforced by federal law (28 U.S.C. § 530B), which requires federal attorneys to conform to state ethical rules, similar to private attorneys. While a state bar's attempt to impose exclusive disciplinary jurisdiction over federal attorneys would raise Supremacy Clause issues, reasonable oversight and application of state ethical standards are permissible and expected."

Just the filing of frivolous lawsuits would be huge in numerous states.

If one of those suggests a negative vote on all three charges than the case should be dropped. And Halligan should be reffered to the Bar Association for disbarment. Playing games w switching the signature page to a different document, with altered statements and forged Grand Jury vote totals should be the end of having a law licence. Even if underlings did it. Our system of justice requires the lawyers to be scrupulously honest.

Or at least getting disbarred.

And these indictments aren't going anywhere.

. . . the old radio show “Ted Macke’s Original Amateur Hour?”

Trump and his cronies can continue their unconstitutional attacks on people all they want. But when they actually involve the third branch of government, the judiciary, they have to reenter the world of reality and present facts and evidence. This is where he has always failed...and it is also where he will fail again.

calling the grand jury foreperson into court to explain.