Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

muriel_volestrangler

(104,720 posts)

5. No, the decision to start using "Department of War" was his, not AI's.

Reply to ancianita (Reply #4)

Sat Sep 6, 2025, 03:22 PM

Sep 6

And there's no way AI said that in the tweet either - it wouldn't have the training. That was Trump, or flunkeys acting on his behalf (and I reckon for bullshitting about Chicago, he'd insist on OKing whatever they wrote).

Since the supine SC 6 gave him immunity for acts as president, he knows he won't get charged for this. He won't need to pretend "my digital team said this without my permission".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Chipocalypse Now': Trump threatens Chicago with 'Department of War' and suggests ICE raids imminent [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 6 OP

Chicago: Bayard Sep 6 #1

This makes me incredibly angry. yardwork Sep 6 #2

So he's going to war with American cities IronLionZion Sep 6 #3

No. He's using AI to tell that story. The facts on the ground will be different. ancianita Sep 6 #4

No, the decision to start using "Department of War" was his, not AI's. muriel_volestrangler Sep 6 #5

I was responding to the conclusion: "So he's going to war with American cities" ancianita Sep 6 #6

But the point is it's not "an AI about going to war with blue cities" muriel_volestrangler Sep 6 #7

I hear you. He's using AI to provoke. ancianita Sep 6 #8