Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(192,983 posts)
3. So if a court determines it to be "illegal" OR DOE Secretary can independently determine it
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 09:24 AM
Aug 16

The Education Department predicts fewer than 10 employers would be barred annually and says it does not expect a "significant reduction" in the share of borrowers receiving forgiveness. Still, the agency acknowledges the impact would not be evenly felt. Schools, universities, health care providers, social work agencies and legal service organizations are among those most likely to face eligibility challenges.

In states that ban gender-affirming care for minors, offering such care could be grounds for exclusion. A court ruling against an employer — or even a legal settlement admitting wrongdoing — could also lead to expulsion from PSLF. The secretary could independently determine ineligibility using a "preponderance of the evidence" standard, meaning it is more likely than not that the allegation is true.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Student Loan Update: Trum...»Reply #3