Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

no_hypocrisy

(53,082 posts)

1. The way I see it:

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat Aug 16, 2025, 07:31 AM

Aug 16

Last edited Sat Aug 16, 2025, 08:52 AM - Edit history (1)

1. This land was taken by force from Native Americans. No sale, no swap, no barter. Stolen.
2. Technically, this land was possessed by the Federal Government and was accessible to Native Americans.
3. This land was held in trust for decades.
4. Now the Federal Government, while talking a good game about "religious freedom," GIVES AWAY ("transfers" ) this land to a company. No compensation, no replacement of a site for religious worship.

I hope this decision is appealed and an immediate temporary restraining order is issued.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

enough Lonestarblue berniesandersmittens bluestarone love_katz IbogaProject Martin Eden

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US judge denies request to halt Oak Flat land transfer to copper mining company [View all] BumRushDaShow Aug 16 OP

The way I see it: no_hypocrisy Aug 16 #1

"I hope this decision is appealed" BumRushDaShow Aug 16 #2