Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 07:26 AM Aug 16

US judge denies request to halt Oak Flat land transfer to copper mining company

Source: AP

Updated 7:51 PM EDT, August 15, 2025


A U.S. district judge on Friday denied the latest request by a Native American tribe, environmentalists and other plaintiffs to stop the federal government from transferring land in Arizona for a massive copper mining project.

The ruling by Judge Dominic Lanza triggered an immediate appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as a deadline fast approaches for the federal government to move ahead with the transfer next week.

Lanza outlined the “stark trade-offs” at the heart of the fight over Oak Flat, an area considered sacred. He pointed to the economic and national security benefits that would come from the land transfer and the indescribable hardships that would result from the permanent destruction of the Apaches’ historical place of worship.

Lanza wrote that the nation’s political branches are responsible for weighing competing objectives and determining how to balance them.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/arizona-oak-flat-copper-mining-apache-ba45e906b1874fda83abca0ca00b2b67



45 judge.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US judge denies request to halt Oak Flat land transfer to copper mining company (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 16 OP
The way I see it: no_hypocrisy Aug 16 #1
"I hope this decision is appealed" BumRushDaShow Aug 16 #2

no_hypocrisy

(53,082 posts)
1. The way I see it:
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 07:31 AM
Aug 16

Last edited Sat Aug 16, 2025, 08:52 AM - Edit history (1)

1. This land was taken by force from Native Americans. No sale, no swap, no barter. Stolen.
2. Technically, this land was possessed by the Federal Government and was accessible to Native Americans.
3. This land was held in trust for decades.
4. Now the Federal Government, while talking a good game about "religious freedom," GIVES AWAY ("transfers" ) this land to a company. No compensation, no replacement of a site for religious worship.

I hope this decision is appealed and an immediate temporary restraining order is issued.

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
2. "I hope this decision is appealed"
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 08:16 AM
Aug 16

Per the OP excerpts, the ruling triggered an "immediate appeal" to the 9th Circuit! Hoping they can get it halted.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US judge denies request t...