Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sdfernando

(5,901 posts)
17. Seems like you are implying the non-partisan board is actually partisan
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 01:04 PM
Aug 5

this is not the case.

California uses a nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC) to draw the boundaries for its congressional, state legislative (Senate and Assembly), and Board of Equalization districts.

Here's how the system works:

Establishment and Authority:
The CRC was established by California voters through two ballot measures: the Voters First Act (Proposition 11) in 2008 for state legislative and Board of Equalization districts, and the Congressional Voters First Act (Proposition 20) in 2010 which extended the commission's authority to include Congressional districts.
These acts transferred the power to draw district lines from the state Legislature to this independent, nonpartisan commission.

Commission Structure and Selection:
The CRC consists of 14 members: five Democrats, five Republicans, and four members not affiliated with either of those two parties.
The commissioners are selected through a rigorous process designed to ensure their independence, starting with an application process handled by the California State Auditor.
Candidates are vetted, narrowed down, and eventually, the initial eight commissioners are randomly selected. These eight then select the remaining six, according to CalMatters.

Redistricting Process and Criteria:
Every ten years, after the federal census, the CRC redraws the district lines to reflect changes in population.
The commission's process emphasizes transparency and public input, involving extensive public hearings and the collection of comments from citizens across the state.
The districts must be drawn in accordance with strict, nonpartisan criteria outlined in the state constitution, including ensuring equal population, complying with the Voting Rights Act, maintaining geographic contiguity and compactness, preserving communities of interest, and keeping city and county lines intact.
Importantly, the CRC is forbidden from drawing districts to benefit a party or candidate, or considering the addresses of incumbents or candidates.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GO, BADASS CALIFORNIA! ancianita Aug 5 #1
Good, they must be stopped Hornedfrog2000 Aug 5 #2
The media is going to drive me crazy. Yesterday, on NBC, the woman filling in for Alex Nitwit went on and on Vinca Aug 5 #3
When are Republicans EVER asked to take the high ground? dlk Aug 5 #5
There is no moral high ground visible except as it's being revealed on the streets and in the fields of California. Magoo48 Aug 5 #11
This orangecrush Aug 5 #30
I love Michelle Obama to dearh, but Oeditpus Rex Aug 5 #23
When they go low... ZDU Aug 5 #28
Drawing such a map now makes it less likely that it will get approved FBaggins Aug 5 #4
Could be AverageOldGuy Aug 5 #6
Of course it is a threat, but it needs to be more than CA and TX and more than 2026 Bluetus Aug 5 #9
I love the idea of the federal legislation on redistricting... SickOfTheOnePct Aug 5 #10
In 2010, there were only a couple of states that had a non-partisan process for districts Bluetus Aug 5 #14
California has an independent commission SickOfTheOnePct Aug 5 #15
That is not what the Princeton survey says. Bluetus Aug 5 #24
It says "Better than average with some bias"... SickOfTheOnePct Aug 5 #25
NY Governor Hochul needs to get right on this, as well dlk Aug 5 #7
Gerrymandering is not cheating SickOfTheOnePct Aug 5 #8
I dispute your claim that California is more gerrymandered than Texas. sdfernando Aug 5 #13
A non-partisan board that drew districts... SickOfTheOnePct Aug 5 #16
Seems like you are implying the non-partisan board is actually partisan sdfernando Aug 5 #17
You believe they are actually non-partisan SickOfTheOnePct Aug 5 #18
In the last national election, 2024, 3 California congressional districts flipped from red to blue. sdfernando Aug 5 #21
If you look at voter registration by party affiliation LogDog75 Aug 5 #32
There are degrees of gerrymandering to be considered dlk Aug 6 #34
Anything that rids of Issa is a go in my book! /nt sdfernando Aug 5 #12
Took the words right out of my mouth!!! AZ8theist Aug 5 #19
I agree1 LogDog75 Aug 5 #33
You never play fair with cheaters and unilaterally disarm DSandra Aug 5 #20
Newsom is fighting! pattyloutwo Aug 5 #22
We need to play hardball. This is a turning point bucolic_frolic Aug 5 #26
Why not eliminate hildegaard28 Aug 5 #27
I'm feeling blue already. usonian Aug 5 #29
Paging other Blue States... Chasstev365 Aug 5 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California moves to disma...»Reply #17