Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(20,440 posts)
14. He must have learned a new word.
Wed Apr 30, 2025, 04:08 PM
Wednesday

In his first term, he would talk about "looking at [a thing] very strongly." That used to drive me nuts, because I've never heard anyone but himself ever use "strongly" that way (or at all, really).

I feel silly talking about a minor annoyance right now, with all the horrible stuff that's going on, but that used to be one of my pet peeves. If he nw wants to say "intently studying" instead, maybe I can focus my anger in a more appropriate direction!

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought they were "failing". louis-t Wednesday #1
He wants to control the reporting. pandr32 Wednesday #2
I get it. I was being sarcastic. louis-t Wednesday #3
No Free Press in America Anymore Since the Cha Wednesday #11
He's always been a liar. pandr32 Wednesday #19
Aloha , Pandr! Cha Wednesday #23
I laugh at that every time the piece of orange shit says "the failing NY Times" FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #30
"We Are Intently Studying"!! The Roux Comes First Wednesday #4
What does that even mean? "Intently"? calimary Wednesday #7
No, it is a normal word muriel_volestrangler Thursday #34
Good to know. Thanks! calimary Thursday #35
He must have learned a new word. ShazzieB Wednesday #14
Remember when he used the term "bigly"? Someone must have taken..... FadedMullet Thursday #32
Not to come to his defense (shudder) but I believe he was slurring "big league." n/t royable Thursday #33
"Tortious interference including in elections." boonecreek Wednesday #5
Fake fight fujiyamasan Wednesday #6
All Trump fights are fake, but he really does have a lawsuit against CBS. maxsolomon Wednesday #17
Who said anything about hating the NYT? fujiyamasan Wednesday #27
"it's actually one of the better newspapers out there." maxsolomon Thursday #42
It's a monster the NY Times did everything to create. NNadir Wednesday #8
you're right... agingdem Wednesday #12
Yes. Peter Baker had an article today using the word "fervor" to describe Trump's energy and activity. Lonestarblue Wednesday #13
"Fervor"...aka vomit-spewing hate-fueled rage tantrums agingdem Wednesday #24
It definitely did not write that TS post AKwannabe Wednesday #9
True that. ShazzieB Wednesday #15
ABOUT BLOODY TIME THEY DID, TOO! Ford_Prefect Wednesday #10
Did you see today's NYT cover page? maxsolomon Wednesday #18
The NYT has been "normalizing" DJT since before his first term in office. They've only recently noticed his excesses, Ford_Prefect Wednesday #21
We must be reading different papers. maxsolomon Wednesday #22
Read it for the crosswords and the theater reviews as a child, then for its insights into civil rights and Viet Nam. Ford_Prefect Wednesday #25
So, you do subscribe now? I don't think you said. maxsolomon Wednesday #26
I read the NYT every day.... reACTIONary Wednesday #29
You cant believe this Hornedfrog2000 Thursday #37
Yes I believe it, no they did not... reACTIONary Thursday #40
That's a laugh..... reACTIONary Wednesday #31
Trump is a politician and a public figure. hadEnuf Wednesday #16
NYT finally pulled their head out of their ass. Joinfortmill Wednesday #20
Huh, the NYT, is learning you can not placate a bully. republianmushroom Wednesday #28
Trump derrangement syndrome isnt a real thing Hornedfrog2000 Thursday #36
It is if you're talking about Dump, he's definitely deranged. mdbl Thursday #38
Resistance is the only way to deal with Trump at this point. Every firm that folded under Trump's threats should Martin68 Thursday #39
No way MorbidButterflyTat Thursday #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New York Times fires back...»Reply #14