General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(10,485 posts)

14. Try reading what I said again. These aren't people simply "associated" with Epstein.

Thu May 21, 2026, 09:16 AM

Thursday

I explicitly said "These names were all explicitly named as being tracked by the FBI (meaning there were what were considered credible accusations made against each of them)". It should be obvious that if the FBI was trcking them due to credible accusation then that means they were suspected of committing crimes.

A redacted accuser accused Lutnick of making his money through ponzi schemes and money laundering. Epstein sold Lutnick a home for 10 dollars which was then sold by Epstein for millions.

A redacted accuser said Leon Black raped her numerous times and sex trafficked her.

and so on... All were explicitly accused of committing crimes directly connected to Epstein.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does anyone have an explanation [View all] Disaffected Wednesday OP

$$$$$ pfitz59 Wednesday #1

Everybody? Disaffected Wednesday #3

They are rich enough. FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #11

Urge Massie to read the names from the floor of the House. Sneederbunk Wednesday #2

I wish someone would but, Disaffected Wednesday #5

Look at what happened to Carmen Mercedes Lineberger, managing assistant U.S. attorney in Fort Pierce, Florida, sop Wednesday #4

Plenty of names have come out. Wiz Imp Wednesday #6

Kevin Warsh's name comes up more than once, too, and yet he was confirmed so damn easily. Karasu Wednesday #10

There's also Brock Pierce. Former child actor now crypto billionaire. Wiz Imp Wednesday #12

OK but are they connected to pedophilia or Disaffected Thursday #13

Try reading what I said again. These aren't people simply "associated" with Epstein. Wiz Imp Thursday #14

Epstein was both a money launderer as well as a sex trafficker and a pedophile. While not everyone named in the files Karasu Thursday #15

He apparently did have some legit or at least semi-legit business ops. Disaffected Thursday #16

Interesting. It does make sense that he was smart enough to have some kind of legitimate cover. Karasu Friday #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Grim Chieftain Wednesday #7

Presence in the files alone does not mean a crime occurred jmbar2 Wednesday #8

Not just money. TNNurse Wednesday #9

Message auto-removed Name removed Friday #18