Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Disaffected

(6,580 posts)
Wed May 20, 2026, 07:30 PM Wednesday

Does anyone have an explanation

why no names in the Epstein Files have been leaked (AFAIK) with the only known probable perps being Trump and Randy Andy?

What with the literally hundreds of people who apparently participated in the perusing and redacting of the files, one would think at least a couple of names would have seeped out by now. Or why not from members of Congress and their staff? Or the victims? Or people who worked for Epstein and on his island? Or the police who investigated Epstein?

Meanwhile the MSM seems to have lost interest in it which is exactly I guess what the Repubs want to accomplish.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FoxNewsSucks

(11,928 posts)
11. They are rich enough.
Wed May 20, 2026, 10:23 PM
Wednesday

Buy off who they need to, but probably threaten most. It's cheaper.

Disaffected

(6,580 posts)
5. I wish someone would but,
Wed May 20, 2026, 07:38 PM
Wednesday

who wants to be a dead-man-walking? Leaks wouldn't be as definitive but a lot safer.

sop

(19,359 posts)
4. Look at what happened to Carmen Mercedes Lineberger, managing assistant U.S. attorney in Fort Pierce, Florida,
Wed May 20, 2026, 07:37 PM
Wednesday

for allegedly attempting to steal a sealed report prepared by Jack Smith on Trump's retention of classified documents. She's been indicted and charged with four felony counts.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
6. Plenty of names have come out.
Wed May 20, 2026, 07:46 PM
Wednesday

These names were all explicitly named as being tracked by the FBI (meaning there were what were considered redible accusations made against each of them):
Trump
Harvey Weinstein
Glen Dubin
Prince Andrew
Jes Staley
Leon Black
Les Wexner
Alan Dershowitz
Howard Lutnick
William Barr
The media has absolutely not lost interest. It continues to be discussed on MSNOW daily. Sarah Kellen (who worked for Epstein and was named as a co-conspirator in the sweetheart deal but claims she was also a victim) will be testifying before the House Oversight Committee tomorrow.

Karasu

(2,086 posts)
10. Kevin Warsh's name comes up more than once, too, and yet he was confirmed so damn easily.
Wed May 20, 2026, 10:18 PM
Wednesday

Elon Musk has several emails in there in which he expresses interest in going to party (which he recently tried to walk back), and of course, there was no actual action taken against him. Too much money, after all.

There’s also the guy who told Epstein he “loved the torture video” (who I believe was also foreign, like Andrew, though his name eludes me at the moment)...among others I’m sure I’m forgetting.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
12. There's also Brock Pierce. Former child actor now crypto billionaire.
Wed May 20, 2026, 10:30 PM
Wednesday

He was front and center at Trump's statue unveiling recently...

Disaffected

(6,580 posts)
13. OK but are they connected to pedophilia or
Thu May 21, 2026, 01:08 AM
Yesterday

associated with Epstein in some other non-illegal way? Lutnick for example visited Epstein's island a couple of times but that in itself is not a crime.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
14. Try reading what I said again. These aren't people simply "associated" with Epstein.
Thu May 21, 2026, 09:16 AM
Yesterday

I explicitly said "These names were all explicitly named as being tracked by the FBI (meaning there were what were considered credible accusations made against each of them)". It should be obvious that if the FBI was trcking them due to credible accusation then that means they were suspected of committing crimes.

A redacted accuser accused Lutnick of making his money through ponzi schemes and money laundering. Epstein sold Lutnick a home for 10 dollars which was then sold by Epstein for millions.

A redacted accuser said Leon Black raped her numerous times and sex trafficked her.

and so on... All were explicitly accused of committing crimes directly connected to Epstein.

Karasu

(2,086 posts)
15. Epstein was both a money launderer as well as a sex trafficker and a pedophile. While not everyone named in the files
Thu May 21, 2026, 08:32 PM
16 hrs ago

has been investigated, you’d be hard-pressed to find many “non-illegal” reasons to associate with the guy. Especially for all these people of wealth.

Disaffected

(6,580 posts)
16. He apparently did have some legit or at least semi-legit business ops.
Thu May 21, 2026, 09:59 PM
15 hrs ago

ChatGPT FWIW on the topic:

......................

Epstein operated several legitimate businesses, though they were often cloaked in secrecy and functioned primarily as a vehicle to manage the assets of ultra-wealthy individuals.

His business dealings included:

Financial Consulting & Estate Planning: After working at Bear Stearns, Epstein launched his own financial firms, including International Assets Group and J. Epstein and Company. He billed himself as a manager of billionaires' money and provided high-end tax mitigation and estate planning.

His known legitimate clients included billionaire Les Wexner (founder of L Brands) and Leon Black.

Venture Capital: Epstein successfully invested in legitimate startups. For example, in 2015 and 2016, he invested $40 million in funds managed by Valar Ventures (co-founded by Peter Thiel), which eventually grew into a stake worth nearly $170 million.

Corporate Entities: He owned several legitimate corporate entities registered in the U.S. Virgin Islands. These served standard, practical business functions such as managing real estate assets, employing his household staff, and facilitating charitable contributions.

..........................

Karasu

(2,086 posts)
17. Interesting. It does make sense that he was smart enough to have some kind of legitimate cover.
Fri May 22, 2026, 02:31 AM
10 hrs ago

Response to Disaffected (Original post)

jmbar2

(8,178 posts)
8. Presence in the files alone does not mean a crime occurred
Wed May 20, 2026, 08:20 PM
Wednesday

Only the victims really know, and if they say anything, they will be mercilessly sued. Lawfare risk...

TNNurse

(7,550 posts)
9. Not just money.
Wed May 20, 2026, 09:23 PM
Wednesday

If you cross him, he has people who will hurt you or your family.

I call them the goon squad.

Response to Disaffected (Original post)

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone have an expla...