Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chief Justice John Roberts says American public wrongly views the justices as 'political actors' [View all]B.See
(8,768 posts)12. TRANSLATION: Klansman in robes tries to blow smoke up our bums.
But right in one way. His blatant racism and bigotry IS NO ACT.
John Roberts might as well wear the robes of the Klan | Opinion - Rawstory via MSN Its not hyperbole to say that while Roberts wears the black robes of a judge, he may as well wear the white robes of the Klan.
Starting as early as 1981, as a 26-year-old lawyer just three years out of Harvard Law School, Roberts began his campaign to undermine the Civil Rights Act. He got himself a job as Special Assistant to Ronald Reagans Attorney General William French Smith. Congress was about to amend the Civil Rights Act to provide that state laws would be illegal if they had a racially discriminatory effect, without having to prove that they had a racially discriminatory intentsomething almost impossible to prove.
Roberts zealously took on the assignment coming up with arguments against the Amendment. Roberts wrote over 25 memos opposing the Amendment.
In one, he argued that the Civil Rights Act was the most intrusive interference imaginable by federal courts into state and local processes.
Roberts zealously took on the assignment coming up with arguments against the Amendment. Roberts wrote over 25 memos opposing the Amendment.
In one, he argued that the Civil Rights Act was the most intrusive interference imaginable by federal courts into state and local processes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chief Justice John Roberts says American public wrongly views the justices as 'political actors' [View all]
In It to Win It
Wednesday
OP
As a retired empiricist, I suggest Roberts take an intro course in examining data.
spooky3
Wednesday
#9
This is like saying the car dealership exists to keep your maintenance costs low
bucolic_frolic
Wednesday
#19
Anyone reading the Writings of Alito and Thomas know that Robert's is full of it.
lostincalifornia
Wednesday
#27
Vain racist piggy so worried how history will view him that he's telling us what to think?
Attilatheblond
Wednesday
#29
They are traitors enabling a coup against our democracy. Until they are removed it will continue to get worse.
Blues Heron
Wednesday
#33
lololol Give it up, dude. You're a piece of shit. Stop trying to convince people otherwise.
Solly Mack
Wednesday
#35
I'm not a lawyer but the 14th amendment article # 3 explicitly said that Trump could not run again
Botany
Wednesday
#42
Sorry, JR, the Fecal Matter Has Been Conspicuously Oozing from you and Your Lying Covert for Years Now
The Roux Comes First
Wednesday
#51
"Damn! It's getting so we get called partisan hacks every fuckin time we act like partisan hacks! It's so unfair!"
struggle4progress
Wednesday
#53
MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
#61
Clyburn: "I think Justice Roberts is gonna take his place alongside some other justices, like Taney
LetMyPeopleVote
10 hrs ago
#63