Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jordan Peterson 'still very sick' amid neurological battle, daughter says: 'This year has been Hell' [View all]irisblue
(37,736 posts)18. Why Are So Many Young Men Drawn to Jordan Peterson's Intellectual Misogyny? 2018 article
https://blog.apaonline.org/2018/02/20/why-are-so-many-young-men-drawn-to-jordan-petersons-intellectual-misogyny/
Snip-"He evidently wants to return to unquestioned patriarchy by paradoxically claiming that the idea that women were oppressed throughout history is an appalling theory. This is an insidious sleight-of-hand in which, by denying that patriarchal oppression ever existed, men can continue to ignore what many women have been saying for centuries, from Mary Wollstonecraft and Simone de Beauvoir to Judith Butler and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and Kate Manne. Furthermore, Peterson has advised his followers to completely avoid the disciplines of sociology, anthropology, English, womens studies, and ethnic and racial studies, a startlingly broad swath of the academy that he sees as corrupted by the supposed evils of feminism, postmodernism, and neo-Marxism. Petersons work invites a much more extensive critique than I have the space (or inclination) to offer here, and there have been numerous excellent critical pieces (including this recent article in The Guardian), but whats more interesting to me is the question of why so many young men are drawn to his work, specifically what need his pseudo-intellectual misogyny fills for these men, some of whom Ive found to be otherwise quite intelligent and reasonable in one-on-one interactions.
The men who are attracted to Petersons ideas seem to have a profound sense that their dominant role in society is coming to an end, and that feminist postmodernism is the primary agent of this loss of privileged status. This grievance is not news to anyone who pays attention to politics, as it is this very sense of loss of an imagined golden age that largely seems to have motivated Trump voters. But the deeper register of this insight is that postmodernism has, in fact, constituted a kind of deatha death of the modernand an end of the certainty and privilege that menespecially straight white menhave experienced in the era currently coming to a close."
More there
Snip-"He evidently wants to return to unquestioned patriarchy by paradoxically claiming that the idea that women were oppressed throughout history is an appalling theory. This is an insidious sleight-of-hand in which, by denying that patriarchal oppression ever existed, men can continue to ignore what many women have been saying for centuries, from Mary Wollstonecraft and Simone de Beauvoir to Judith Butler and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and Kate Manne. Furthermore, Peterson has advised his followers to completely avoid the disciplines of sociology, anthropology, English, womens studies, and ethnic and racial studies, a startlingly broad swath of the academy that he sees as corrupted by the supposed evils of feminism, postmodernism, and neo-Marxism. Petersons work invites a much more extensive critique than I have the space (or inclination) to offer here, and there have been numerous excellent critical pieces (including this recent article in The Guardian), but whats more interesting to me is the question of why so many young men are drawn to his work, specifically what need his pseudo-intellectual misogyny fills for these men, some of whom Ive found to be otherwise quite intelligent and reasonable in one-on-one interactions.
The men who are attracted to Petersons ideas seem to have a profound sense that their dominant role in society is coming to an end, and that feminist postmodernism is the primary agent of this loss of privileged status. This grievance is not news to anyone who pays attention to politics, as it is this very sense of loss of an imagined golden age that largely seems to have motivated Trump voters. But the deeper register of this insight is that postmodernism has, in fact, constituted a kind of deatha death of the modernand an end of the certainty and privilege that menespecially straight white menhave experienced in the era currently coming to a close."
More there
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jordan Peterson 'still very sick' amid neurological battle, daughter says: 'This year has been Hell' [View all]
BlueWaveNeverEnd
Tuesday
OP
Why Are So Many Young Men Drawn to Jordan Peterson's Intellectual Misogyny? 2018 article
irisblue
Wednesday
#18
Very much so..like Dennis Prager..fake scholarism cloaking a hate for women
BlueWaveNeverEnd
Wednesday
#22
"He pushed the hatred of women and LGBT, couched in a philosophy of self improvement" EXACTLY!!!
BlueWaveNeverEnd
Wednesday
#29