Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,574 posts)
3. It would surely be helpful if Maureen Comey (or others Epstein investigators since fired by Trump/Bondi)
Sat Mar 7, 2026, 03:25 PM
Saturday

would come out and explain why nothing much happened for 4 years regarding the Jane Doe 4 case under Biden/Garland.

I think it's likely the answer would be that it was assessed as being (at least partly) a hoax, as was I'd imagine their assessment of the 2016 Tiffany Doe case that was promulgated by Norm Lubow (who was fired from job as producer for *The Springer Show* for excessively for coaching guests to make up bullshit stories, to make for better TV). That is the only other case where a minor went on record claiming Trump abused her sexually apart from Jane Doe 4, fwiw.

All I'm saying is that Democrats would be wise to focus on the fact that this interview was HIDDEN, because that is CLEARLY against the law Congress passed, regardless of whether Jane Doe 4's accounting is logical to believe (in entirety).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Discussion with Claude AI»Reply #3