Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DET

(2,425 posts)

6. New Evidence

Reply to angrychair (Original post)

Tue Feb 10, 2026, 02:28 PM

22 hrs ago

It’s getting more coverage today because the door camera that we were told had no footage of the crime unexpectedly did (recovered from back servers). And the footage is really creepy but very revealing. For better or worse, a lot of people find this story fascinating. I would imagine that the perp will be found soon and coverage will taper off.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kidnapping of Guthrie's mother [View all] angrychair 23 hrs ago OP

Correct. efhmc 23 hrs ago #1

Yep. dlilafae 22 hrs ago #2

Not sure where your complaint is. ificandream 22 hrs ago #3

I kind of agree, but this has become typical ScratchCat 22 hrs ago #4

I can't tell you exactly what the criteria is today .... ificandream 17 hrs ago #7

Yeah. My sister who lives in moonscape 17 hrs ago #10

People prefer it leftstreet 22 hrs ago #5

You don't need a ratings consultant for a story like this one. ificandream 17 hrs ago #8

New Evidence DET 22 hrs ago #6

And Nancy Guthrie, too ... alive I hope.... ificandream 17 hrs ago #9

They can walk and chew gum at the same time MustLoveBeagles 17 hrs ago #11

Yep malaise 17 hrs ago #12

It's more about ratings. These type of stories get views JI7 17 hrs ago #13

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kidnapping of Guthrie's m...»Reply #6