Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(9,764 posts)

7. Yep.

Thu Dec 4, 2025, 07:33 AM

Yesterday

She was 'strong-willed', which was the usual description of a female that actually had a brain and was not afraid to use it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My theory why The Queen didn't rein in Andrew Mountbatten Windsor: [View all] no_hypocrisy Yesterday OP

He was her favorite... hlthe2b Yesterday #1

Coupled with pragmatism. no_hypocrisy Yesterday #2

Ha ha. Well known that Phillip had a separate family. Irish_Dem Yesterday #9

As do billionairs get the red out Yesterday #12

The ultra wealthy have Bettie Yesterday #13

All aristocrats malaise Yesterday #17

Bad analogy: I don't recall Alice Roosevelt ever raping children. Chasstev365 Yesterday #4

Yep. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #7

I've often thought it was because of her sister Margaret rpannier Yesterday #8

The Queen doesn't edhopper Yesterday #10

The Queen didn't rein in Andrew because she didn't have to dlk Yesterday #11

No one in the adult version of reality is a "Queen" or a "Prince" GreatGazoo Yesterday #14

I believe with all due respect, PCIntern Yesterday #15

Here are King Charles' conceivable powers GreatGazoo Yesterday #16