Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AdamGG

(1,852 posts)
19. I think in most previous years, electability has been biggest/one of biggest factors in primaries
Thu Nov 27, 2025, 02:50 PM
Thursday

In the past, I think the Democratic primaries have valued electability very highly. In 2004, Howard Dean led in all the polls until the primaries started and then John Kerry pretty much swept them. I think you have to go back to McGovern in 1972 where a more left leaning candidate won the nomination.

There will be a movement for 2028 where some people say that it's time for us to have a nominee who isn't another centrist and actually pushes to enact more progressive policies. My guess is that that will be a major dividing line in the primaries and that the candidates will be seen as falling into one camp or the other.

I don't oppose most of the progressive policies, my concern is whether that candidate can get elected, and I think a lot of people vote based on that like I do. I almost feel guilty that I really like Pete Buttigieg, but I'd be hesitant to vote for him for president because I'd be concerned that because of the way much of America is, being gay could make it harder for him to be elected. I do the same thing when considering very progressive presidential nominees and I suspect that lots of people do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think he would make a great candidate - IMO, whomever the Dem nominee is after Trump will win handily. walkingman Nov 25 #1
Well, I can't imagine that will happen, frankly. MineralMan Nov 25 #2
Newsom - Kelly ticket? maveric Nov 25 #3
Since it's become obvious that we're going to have to run a ticket of white guys Ocelot II Nov 25 #6
It would lack geographic balance AdamGG Nov 25 #10
He was probably going to run before this all happened. Fiendish Thingy Nov 25 #4
Would Gabby's continuing challenges be a reason he might not be interested? 3catwoman3 Nov 25 #5
I believe he said something along those lines xmas74 Nov 26 #14
Hegseth certainly has guaranteed a 2027 Johonny Nov 25 #7
Add to that, he's a drunk who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. nt MarineCombatEngineer Nov 25 #11
Hope so. I'd love to see Newsom, Pritzker and Kelly chewing up Vance everyday Arazi Nov 25 #8
Yep, he's really upped his game and national profile Attilatheblond Nov 25 #9
Mark Kelly's senate seat will end in 2028. I Emile Nov 25 #12
I prefer whichever President/VP nominees AdamGG Nov 25 #13
The funny thing is that if he were nominated he might win EASILY Wanderlust988 Nov 26 #15
I'm not sure if that's fully accurate about the party AdamGG Thursday #16
Maybe I spend too much time on DU reading posts Wanderlust988 Thursday #18
I think in most previous years, electability has been biggest/one of biggest factors in primaries AdamGG Thursday #19
I like Pete too but I don't see America is ready for a first husband Wanderlust988 Thursday #20
Agreed - I wish Pete AdamGG Thursday #21
de rec Celerity Thursday #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Mark Kelly's tiket ju...»Reply #19