Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Two days prior to the incident, Greene paid a Pennsylvania body-modification artist $500 to make cuts to her face, neck, back and shoulder using a scalpel, in a pattern she had provided, according to court documents.
Two (possibly rhetorical) questions occur to me here:
1. How messed up does someone have to be to pay a body modification artist to do something like this to them?
2. If the cuts were made 2 days earlier, wouldn't if be obvious to skilled observers (i.e., health care professionals who cared for her in the hospital) that they weren't freshly made?
Seriously, this sounds like an open and shut case. The evidence seems to be overwhelming. Can't you just imagine the testimony of the body mod artist ("Yeah, I made those cuts, she brought in a design of what she wanted and paid me for the work" ) and the doctor who saw her in the ER (No, those cuts were not fresh, they looked like they were made a couple of days before I saw her." )
The stupid, it burns!
If she's offered a plea deal, she'd be really stupid to turn it down. But we already know she's really stupid, so who knows?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read