Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(1,725 posts)
27. Interesting stuff, I will look forward to the follow-up interview
Fri Oct 3, 2025, 03:15 PM
17 hrs ago

So, am I interpreting this correctly: is the guest saying was that wherever the turnout % was high, that above a certain threshold, all votes began to be calculated as "Trump votes", and that was the means by which it was stolen? Almost all the votes were tabulated on machines from two companies, and may both have had corrupted tabulator code, basically? This seems like it would relatively easy to check by looking at the timestamps of when votes were counted, and what they showed. The turnout % could not be known positively in advance, so the machines would have to be acting this way 'on the fly' when the threshold was actually hit by actual vote counts. So you'd see that like, after 9:21 pm, the vote % for Trump suddenly diverged in a statistically improbable way.

Or am I missing something?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Auditing could be too late CNYHarris 19 hrs ago #1
WOW John Coktosten 18 hrs ago #2
Trump wants to ban mail in ballots CNYHarris 18 hrs ago #3
No, you can't call the voter to see true voter intent. Ms. Toad 16 hrs ago #75
Post removed Post removed 18 hrs ago #4
I won't ever believe he was elected. BurnDoubt 18 hrs ago #5
I've never believed it either BonnieJW 17 hrs ago #36
And (correct me if I'm wrong here); robbob 16 hrs ago #81
The closest swing state was Wisconsin... SickOfTheOnePct 16 hrs ago #94
Ok, I guess it was just another internet rumour. robbob 10 hrs ago #143
No RandySF 18 hrs ago #6
It was rigged from the start 31st Street Bridge 18 hrs ago #7
I believe we have to focus on your concern. yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #82
Most definately. Very evident when you have precincts that voted all democrat with Trump for president. LiberalArkie 16 hrs ago #91
I have thought this since the election took place. Trump was thanking Musk for the use of his computers. OLDMDDEM 18 hrs ago #8
I watched about half of this creeksneakers2 18 hrs ago #9
if only NJCher 18 hrs ago #11
OK, I'll watch the rest creeksneakers2 18 hrs ago #18
I watched the rest creeksneakers2 17 hrs ago #38
Voting machines are not programmed with lots of people around questionseverything 17 hrs ago #60
I gave up on this kind of fact-free clickbait long ago. Good on you Maru Kitteh 15 hrs ago #122
That's the problem for more exposure lildDemz 17 hrs ago #39
Yeah, it's funny how the conspiracy theorists who make these videos... SickOfTheOnePct 18 hrs ago #14
I understood that what they do, which I have to assume they do before they open the doors for the public, is Escurumbele 18 hrs ago #19
For that to work... SickOfTheOnePct 18 hrs ago #21
Follow the tabulators Doremus 17 hrs ago #58
In Virginia... SickOfTheOnePct 17 hrs ago #63
Do you understand, you can't see software? questionseverything 16 hrs ago #67
Having been a computer programmer ... SickOfTheOnePct 16 hrs ago #69
Not if a predetermined result was programmed in at the factory questionseverything 16 hrs ago #71
I'm saying ... SickOfTheOnePct 16 hrs ago #77
Musk knew that the Central Tabulators and Operating Systems of E.S.&E and Dominion Voting Systems had Botany 15 hrs ago #120
No state uses a single set of "central tabulators" to count all of the state's vote... SickOfTheOnePct 15 hrs ago #121
The flipping of votes from Harris to Trump and or the deletions of Harris votes were not pre programed into Botany 15 hrs ago #124
But for all of the tabulators... SickOfTheOnePct 14 hrs ago #129
Musk by passed the internet with his use of Starlink and DTC .... direct to cell .... in getting data from and or ... Botany 14 hrs ago #133
There's no cell phone connection either. n/t Ms. Toad 14 hrs ago #135
Your post brought up some issues I remember from... Chemical Bill 14 hrs ago #132
I'm an election worker and that can't be done Kaleva 17 hrs ago #30
Same n/t SickOfTheOnePct 17 hrs ago #35
Observer for more than a decade - same. Ms. Toad 7 hrs ago #148
It would not be that easy. creeksneakers2 17 hrs ago #41
Thank you for adding some reason and reality to this discussion AverageOldGuy 16 hrs ago #84
How it was done is not the first question. returnee 16 hrs ago #85
when all is said and done NJCher 18 hrs ago #10
The last legitimate win for a republican for POTUS was in 1956 and in every case starting with Nixon in '68 Botany 18 hrs ago #22
Bush v. Gore being a classic example Ritabert 17 hrs ago #40
What Botany said! yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #88
2024, 2016, 2004, 2000 yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #87
Election deniers get old. Silent Type 18 hrs ago #12
I guess we love our country more than NJCher 17 hrs ago #25
Nah, it's just kind of a sad spectacle at this point. Just like 9/11 truthers, moon landing deniers, tritsofme 17 hrs ago #26
you always have the same comment NJCher 17 hrs ago #29
Yes, I happen to exist in the reality based community. tritsofme 17 hrs ago #32
common answer, again NJCher 9 hrs ago #145
Until the facts change, the comment doesn't need to change EdmondDantes_ 16 hrs ago #95
again NJCher 9 hrs ago #146
LOL. Silent Type 17 hrs ago #46
Everybody gets old if they're lucky. returnee 16 hrs ago #89
The Election Truth Alliance is garbage EdmondDantes_ 18 hrs ago #13
Grifting grifters are going to grift gullible rubes, that is a given. tritsofme 18 hrs ago #16
explain it, then NJCher 17 hrs ago #28
I'm not the one making the unsupported conspiracy theory EdmondDantes_ 15 hrs ago #100
strictly your opinion NJCher 9 hrs ago #144
You Already Know What i'm Going To Say Mr.Bee 18 hrs ago #15
Well, Democrats better do something about it because it will only get worst for the 2026 and 2028 elections. Escurumbele 18 hrs ago #17
Supposing for a moment their claims are true EdmondDantes_ 18 hrs ago #20
Because AZJonnie 17 hrs ago #33
Given it would require actors all over the country, including Democrats, nope. EdmondDantes_ 15 hrs ago #103
Did you watch the show? AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #107
We already know. live love laugh 18 hrs ago #23
Doesn't really matter at this point does it? BlueTsunami2018 18 hrs ago #24
Interesting stuff, I will look forward to the follow-up interview AZJonnie 17 hrs ago #27
You're missing the bit about the swing states using paper ballots Abnredleg 17 hrs ago #42
I hope it did not sound like I was conveying that I thought the CT presented by the guest was LIKELY AZJonnie 16 hrs ago #98
It's not that past a certain threshold all votes were recorded for *rump questionseverything 17 hrs ago #49
Depends on recounting paper ballots. We're not allowed to recount paper ballots. Festivito 17 hrs ago #31
Paper ballots are counted during risk limiting audits /nt Abnredleg 17 hrs ago #43
No they aren't, a small sample are counted not even an entire precinct questionseverything 17 hrs ago #50
Yes, it is understood that audits work off samples Abnredleg 17 hrs ago #52
Counting paper ballots openly and transparently would work too questionseverything 17 hrs ago #56
The audits are done in front of observers Abnredleg 17 hrs ago #61
No one is suggesting counting the entire county at once questionseverything 16 hrs ago #66
I've yet to find an election official of either party Abnredleg 16 hrs ago #72
Democracy demands transparency for the average citizen so questionseverything 16 hrs ago #79
All parties have observers watching every step of the process Abnredleg 16 hrs ago #90
Full public view means, where the public can see questionseverything 16 hrs ago #97
There is a reason no election officials support hand counts Abnredleg 16 hrs ago #99
*rump's people were trying to cause crap, I simply want transparency questionseverything 15 hrs ago #106
The green obnoxiousdrunk 17 hrs ago #34
Please Watch This Video ... kooth 17 hrs ago #37
Does it explain how they got around the audits Abnredleg 17 hrs ago #45
I remain malaise 17 hrs ago #44
He brings up some good points, the data look quite suspicious, but there is no Fil1957 17 hrs ago #47
Do you want a Smoking Gun? Botany 17 hrs ago #54
How would they know which ballot to toss? Kaleva 17 hrs ago #57
It's actually illegal to look at the paper ballots in Florida questionseverything 17 hrs ago #64
Same in Michigan Kaleva 14 hrs ago #128
It's not that they are tossing ballots questionseverything 6 hrs ago #153
Peter Thiel's Palantir was and is very good at running large batch files of data and democratic leaning voters Botany 17 hrs ago #65
But how do you match the ballot with the dem leaning voter? Kaleva 14 hrs ago #130
I. D. K. Botany 14 hrs ago #134
The point is they are publishing results that are inaccurate questionseverything 13 hrs ago #136
Voter suppression is well documented going back to the 2000 presidential election. My point is that as long there are Fil1957 15 hrs ago #101
I disagree with you but in a nice way. Botany 15 hrs ago #118
I, 100% agree about that 30% bluestarone 15 hrs ago #123
And call me a conspiracy nut but I think the planned and calculated crippling of education helps in the .. Botany 15 hrs ago #126
Man, you got that right! bluestarone 14 hrs ago #127
Oy Vey DemocratSinceBirth 17 hrs ago #48
This is NOT a both sides do it situation. Buddyzbuddy 17 hrs ago #51
We could count the paper ballots openly and transparently questionseverything 17 hrs ago #55
There's a reason why fraud cases have to be " pled with particularity" Abnredleg 17 hrs ago #59
Can I prove there was cheating? No. Buddyzbuddy 16 hrs ago #68
Sure, you can find statistical arguments to support your claim Abnredleg 16 hrs ago #76
The evidence presented answers most questions that might be brought up. Buddyzbuddy 12 hrs ago #137
My skepticism comes from decades of government IT Abnredleg 12 hrs ago #139
I appreciate your experience and knowledge. Buddyzbuddy 11 hrs ago #141
The delays due to bombs were made up Abnredleg 11 hrs ago #142
Very compelling facts, thank you. Buddyzbuddy 7 hrs ago #147
Statistics can be manipulated, that's why risk limiting audits are worthless questionseverything 15 hrs ago #109
Different type of statistical analysis Abnredleg 15 hrs ago #114
lol, ok , so your statistics good, election integrity statistics bad questionseverything 15 hrs ago #116
The statistical methods used to select random samples Abnredleg 12 hrs ago #140
See post #71 questionseverything 6 hrs ago #151
Well said. yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #96
C'mon everybody, no two or more people would ever agree in secret to break the law Gaugamela 17 hrs ago #53
Like moths to a flame JoseBalow 17 hrs ago #62
Uh oh---gatekeepers not liking this one at all. Kingofalldems 16 hrs ago #70
Bev Harris? madinmaryland 16 hrs ago #73
"I just want to find 11,780, uh, votes." Kid Berwyn 16 hrs ago #74
Whatever became of the claim here there were a couple of counties in New York where Harris did not receive a single vote Gimpyknee 16 hrs ago #78
The county is fighting tooth and nail to make sure regular human beings don't get to count those ballots questionseverything 15 hrs ago #104
The judge in the Rockland County, New York lawsuit has until November 8 to decide annielion 15 hrs ago #112
Pure clickbait... but without the ALL CAPS YELLOW IMPACT FONT, and a YELLOW ARROW pointing at Trump. QueerDuck 16 hrs ago #80
Bull. n/t returnee 16 hrs ago #92
Could we please stop this "Trump did not win in 2024" bullshit??? AverageOldGuy 16 hrs ago #83
Good luck with that. This seems to be unlikely. QueerDuck 15 hrs ago #119
Thanks for your service as an election worker dwayneb 12 hrs ago #138
Yup. Joinfortmill 16 hrs ago #86
Computer voting systems are always hackable. Always. annielion 16 hrs ago #93
I got tired of being yelled at for linking the unbelievable evidence Eliot Rosewater 15 hrs ago #102
I would call the "evidence" not believable v. unbelievable n/t SickOfTheOnePct 15 hrs ago #105
I believe Statitstics, Numbers and Math Mr.Bee 15 hrs ago #108
My two cents? MAGA has B.See 15 hrs ago #113
Especially when the piece of shit himself announces before the election that his friend musk knows those voting machine Eliot Rosewater 15 hrs ago #115
Here Eliot Rosewater 15 hrs ago #117
Perhaps not as amazed as you might think. B.See 14 hrs ago #131
Not a thread on this? Seriously? Offhand, I can recall a number of them posted niyad 15 hrs ago #110
Three parts make sure to watch them all. No it isn't a comedian making the claim Eliot Rosewater 15 hrs ago #111
Trump fans not liking this thread one bit. Kingofalldems 15 hrs ago #125
Post removed Post removed 7 hrs ago #150
Whatcha got against Halloween? berniesandersmittens 6 hrs ago #152
There was no fix. The Right Wing Controls the Media. Americans Are Stupid. MAGA is a cult. Simple as that. NT Blasphemer 7 hrs ago #149
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BOMBSHELL CLAIM: TRUMP DI...»Reply #27