Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(170,526 posts)
1. MaddowBlog-The brewing fight over Adelita Grijalva's congressional swearing-in and the Epstein files
Tue Sep 30, 2025, 05:30 PM
Tuesday

The Arizona Democrat will be the 218th signature on a discharge petition on the Jeffrey Epstein files. Will this lead GOP leaders to delay her swearing-in?

The brewing fight over Adelita Grijalva’s congressional swearing-in and the Epstein files | The Arizona Democrat will be the 218th signature on a discharge petitio... | www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

CHBstills (@chbstills.bsky.social) 2025-09-30T06:07:15.534Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/brewing-fight-adelita-grijalvas-congressional-swearing-epstein-files-rcna234511

All the Arizonan has to do is wait for the chamber to return from its current break, at which point she can take the oath of office. With that outcome hanging in the balance, The Arizona Republic reported:

Democrat Adelita Grijalva has for months been on a glide path to become Arizona’s next member of Congress. But now that she’s been elected, as the U.S. House stares down a government funding standoff and a bombshell measure related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a political fight is brewing around when exactly Grijalva will be sworn in.


At the heart of the matter is a question about how best to deal with routine electoral bureaucracy.

In theory, Grijalva could be sworn in as Congress’ newest member on Oct. 7, the day members get back to work. This would be consistent with standard practice, including recent developments with Democratic Rep. James Walkinshaw of Virginia, who was declared the unofficial winner of his special election and was sworn days later......

The House speaker’s office hasn’t elaborated on its plans, saying only that the chamber would wait for the “appropriate paperwork.” But as a practical matter, Congress has already received the appropriate paperwork: Arizona Secretary of State’s Office notified the House clerk last week that Grijalva is the unofficial election winner based on the lopsided results.

Under standard practices, that should be plenty. “This documentation has been sufficient to swear in multiple members of Congress,” a spokesperson for the Democrats on the House Administration Committee told the Arizona Republic.

Will the Speaker’s Office agree? Is there a reason Johnson is being coy about this? Watch this space.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MaddowBlog-The brewing fight over Adelita Grijalva's congressional swearing-in and the Epstein files LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #1
Why he wanted no votes malaise Tuesday #8
I guess that is why he wants to go on break in the middle of a government shut down. Bev54 Tuesday #10
Amen. Wednesdays Tuesday #2
I'm shocked markodochartaigh Tuesday #3
What happened with the Writ of Mandemus? ananda Tuesday #4
No court would grant one at this point in time and she hasn't asked for one. onenote Tuesday #30
I don't like it. I mean.. ananda Tuesday #35
The House is not currently in session and hasn't been since September 19. Wiz Imp Tuesday #5
The goal is to delay the vote as long as possible liberalgunwilltravel Tuesday #12
The delay will make no difference with that Wiz Imp Tuesday #15
It's not the Democrats who will flip liberalgunwilltravel Yesterday #41
Thank You mikewv Tuesday #34
If she isn't sworn in on October 7, then everyone needs to raise holy hell Wiz Imp Tuesday #36
I read that is what usually happens gab13by13 Tuesday #39
I was under the impression that a federal judge Conjuay Tuesday #6
Lord, I hope that's correct. Let's get this done. QueerDuck Tuesday #7
That is not correct. onenote Tuesday #16
Weaseldick Johnson... GiqueCee Tuesday #9
Its time for her district to sue for Figarosmom Tuesday #11
Taxation without representation Seinan Sensei Tuesday #13
How is it possible that a newly elected Congresswoman has still not been sworn in? Botany Tuesday #14
Because tiny johnson is terrified Javaman Tuesday #17
tiny johnson Maru Kitteh Tuesday #18
You want to place a wager on either of those 2 predictions? Wiz Imp Tuesday #37
We have a criminal goverment. TNNurse Tuesday #19
Time to remove Marshmallow Mike Warpy Tuesday #20
The word legal has no meaning to the MAGAts. flashman13 Tuesday #21
It's the Mitch McConnell precedent. Mblaze Tuesday #22
I call it the "McConnell Effect". n/t ReRe Tuesday #23
It's further proof that the Repukes cannot govern FakeNoose Tuesday #24
Malaise: Does the Secretary of State in Arizona have to certify the special election? LiberalArkie Tuesday #25
Good question malaise Tuesday #26
I kept looking and finally found it. LiberalArkie Tuesday #27
She won by such a whopping majority that there shouldn't be any questions FakeNoose Tuesday #28
Probably won't be, but there are rules (thank god). We are the party of rules. LiberalArkie Tuesday #33
Thanks malaise Tuesday #31
No. The winner in Virginia in early September and the 2 in Florida in April Wiz Imp Tuesday #38
I guess that will be the republican strategy from here on. Crunchy Frog Tuesday #29
Here: Hassin Bin Sober Tuesday #32
Legislature shut down to prevent motion to release Epstein Files usonian Tuesday #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How is it possible that n...»Reply #1