Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Frasier Balzov

(4,583 posts)

4. I thought you were asking them to prove he didn't.

Reply to Klarkashton (Reply #2)

Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:19 PM

Monday

Seeing him carry it away wouldn't prove that he didn't take it, of course.

It would demonstrate that he DID take it.

You're saying demand they show us the surveillance video and call their bluff when they won't because it must certainly confirm his guilt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How about proof that Homan didn't take the money? [View all] Klarkashton Monday OP

How do you prove a negative if it was cash? Frasier Balzov Monday #1

How about him carrying it away. It's pretty fucking simple. Klarkashton Monday #2

I thought you were asking them to prove he didn't. Frasier Balzov Monday #4

If anybody walks away with 50k under those circumstances Klarkashton Monday #9

Yep. That's what the poster said. stopdiggin Tuesday #20

I don't think there was cash in the envelope. multigraincracker Monday #3

Apparently, there is some question of legality because he was not in a position to deliver contracts in Sept 2024. Silent Type Monday #5

So what. If he took $50k that's all we need to know. Klarkashton Monday #7

We knew he was a crook to get appointed, but that won't convict him. Silent Type Monday #12

Nothing is going to convict him. He is immune from Klarkashton Monday #13

Doubt he's immune in that delivering contracts under table ain't an official duty, though who knows Silent Type Monday #17

It could not be bribery because he wasn't in office yet Jersey Devil Monday #15

The point was that either he took the bag of money or he didn't. Klarkashton Tuesday #18

Isn't that advocating fascism Kaleva Monday #6

No Klarkashton Monday #10

And did he declare the $50G on his income tax return. Jersey Devil Monday #16

It's up to the accusers to provide proof that he did Kaleva Tuesday #21

There is video, tapes and files of the money transfer. gab13by13 Monday #11

No need to wait EarlG Tuesday #19

The accused don't have to prove their innocence Kaleva Tuesday #23

There is fucking proof, or was, gab13by13 Monday #8

If pressed hard enough ( it won't happen) they will Klarkashton Monday #14

The FBI filmed the transaction. Emile Tuesday #22