Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:06 PM Monday

How about proof that Homan didn't take the money?

How fucking hard is that?

What's the problem? We don't deserve proof?

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How about proof that Homan didn't take the money? (Original Post) Klarkashton Monday OP
How do you prove a negative if it was cash? Frasier Balzov Monday #1
How about him carrying it away. It's pretty fucking simple. Klarkashton Monday #2
I thought you were asking them to prove he didn't. Frasier Balzov Monday #4
If anybody walks away with 50k under those circumstances Klarkashton Monday #9
Yep. That's what the poster said. stopdiggin Tuesday #20
I don't think there was cash in the envelope. multigraincracker Monday #3
Apparently, there is some question of legality because he was not in a position to deliver contracts in Sept 2024. Silent Type Monday #5
So what. If he took $50k that's all we need to know. Klarkashton Monday #7
We knew he was a crook to get appointed, but that won't convict him. Silent Type Monday #12
Nothing is going to convict him. He is immune from Klarkashton Monday #13
Doubt he's immune in that delivering contracts under table ain't an official duty, though who knows Silent Type Monday #17
It could not be bribery because he wasn't in office yet Jersey Devil Monday #15
The point was that either he took the bag of money or he didn't. Klarkashton Tuesday #18
Isn't that advocating fascism Kaleva Monday #6
No Klarkashton Monday #10
And did he declare the $50G on his income tax return. Jersey Devil Monday #16
It's up to the accusers to provide proof that he did Kaleva Tuesday #21
There is video, tapes and files of the money transfer. gab13by13 Monday #11
No need to wait EarlG Tuesday #19
The accused don't have to prove their innocence Kaleva Tuesday #23
There is fucking proof, or was, gab13by13 Monday #8
If pressed hard enough ( it won't happen) they will Klarkashton Monday #14
The FBI filmed the transaction. Emile Tuesday #22

Frasier Balzov

(4,582 posts)
1. How do you prove a negative if it was cash?
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:09 PM
Monday

Even if he produced his bank records, the absence of a deposit doesn't negate the receipt of cash which he has otherwise spent or converted.

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
2. How about him carrying it away. It's pretty fucking simple.
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:11 PM
Monday

Did he walk away with it?

That's not a fucking negative.

Frasier Balzov

(4,582 posts)
4. I thought you were asking them to prove he didn't.
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:19 PM
Monday

Seeing him carry it away wouldn't prove that he didn't take it, of course.

It would demonstrate that he DID take it.

You're saying demand they show us the surveillance video and call their bluff when they won't because it must certainly confirm his guilt.

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
9. If anybody walks away with 50k under those circumstances
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:30 PM
Monday

It's a goddamn sting.

Sorry but a lot of barroom logic what ifs aren't cutting it.

Silent Type

(11,261 posts)
5. Apparently, there is some question of legality because he was not in a position to deliver contracts in Sept 2024.
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:19 PM
Monday

So, there was concern prosecution would be difficult.

It’s BS, but that’s the quess by attorneys with little interest in protecting trump admin.

Now, if he delivered the contracts after trump inaugurated, he should be toast after a few weeks of WH circling the wagons.

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
13. Nothing is going to convict him. He is immune from
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:36 PM
Monday

Any laws we know that.

All I want to know is that he did or didn't walk away from the deal.

Silent Type

(11,261 posts)
17. Doubt he's immune in that delivering contracts under table ain't an official duty, though who knows
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:56 PM
Monday

with today’s courts.

Jersey Devil

(10,494 posts)
15. It could not be bribery because he wasn't in office yet
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:51 PM
Monday

though he could be charged with conspiracy to commit bribery (in the future). The FBI was apparently waiting to see if he followed up on his promises to deliver contracts when Trump, or one of his minions, pulled the plug on the investigation. But another question even if no bribery or conspiracy charges could brought: Did he declare the $50,000 on his 2024 income tax return?

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
18. The point was that either he took the bag of money or he didn't.
Tue Sep 23, 2025, 12:16 AM
Tuesday

Leavitt claimed that he didn't.
Did he or didn't he? We all know that nothing is going to be done about it.

Kaleva

(39,967 posts)
6. Isn't that advocating fascism
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:28 PM
Monday

A person accused has to provide proof that they didn’t commit a crime

Jersey Devil

(10,494 posts)
16. And did he declare the $50G on his income tax return.
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:55 PM
Monday

If he didn't then it is tax fraud regardless of whether it was bribery or not

gab13by13

(29,873 posts)
11. There is video, tapes and files of the money transfer.
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:31 PM
Monday

If Homan wants to prove his innocence do it through the DOJ and FBI who investigated him.

Waiting for Democrats to demand that the FBI and DOJ release the documents.

EarlG

(23,192 posts)
19. No need to wait
Tue Sep 23, 2025, 12:18 AM
Tuesday

September 21:

‘Release the Tapes’: Lawmakers Demand Answers Over Alleged $50,000 Bribe of Trump Border Czar Tom Homan

“Who’s the illegal now, Tom Homan?” asked Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).

(snip)

“Tom Homan should be fired immediately and charged,” said Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.). “Kash Patel should be suspended pending impeachment proceedings, and anyone who aided in this cover-up should be held accountable. Homan’s relationship with GEO Group, who own Delaney Hall in Newark, should be thoroughly investigated, and the facility closed pending that investigation. The amount of corruption in this administration is endless.”

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) had a similar reaction. “Corruption that’s stunning even for this administration,” Markey said. “Homan and anyone who knew and covered this up must resign.”

(snip)

Release the tapes—Americans deserve disclosure of evidence showing top DHS official Homan accepting a bag full of $50,000 in cash,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “We need to know why the investigation was dropped—all the facts and evidence.”

https://www.commondreams.org/news/tom-homan-50000-cash

September 22:

Democrats demand answers on Homan bribery investigation

“Did Trump’s DOJ shut down this bribery investigation? Was it Attorney General Bondi or FBI Director Patel? The act was caught on camera. The administration must turn over the tapes to Congress,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Sunday in a post on the social platform X.

(snip)

“Border Czar Tom Homan was caught by the FBI accepting bribes – on camera – to deliver government contracts in exchange for $50,000 in cash. Pam Bondi knew. Kash Patel knew. Emil Bove knew,” Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Saturday in an X post.

“And they made the investigation go away. A corrupt attempt to conceal brazen graft,” the Golden State senator added.

(snip)

Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D) said Saturday on X that “we cannot become numb to this type of corruption.”

“This is a senior official in charge of stewarding taxpayer dollars. We need access to this FBI case file, and then review the taxpayer dollars that Tom Homan has overseen at the White House,” she added.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5515952-trump-border-czar-probe-outrage/

Kaleva

(39,967 posts)
23. The accused don't have to prove their innocence
Tue Sep 23, 2025, 06:09 AM
Tuesday

People are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

gab13by13

(29,873 posts)
8. There is fucking proof, or was,
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:28 PM
Monday

the FBI taped the transfer of money. There should also be files.

Klarkashton

(4,091 posts)
14. If pressed hard enough ( it won't happen) they will
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 11:38 PM
Monday

Provide all the 'evidence' in "two weeks" IOW never.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How about proof that Homa...