Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Turning Point USA Calls Kirk's Assassination A Miracle [View all]taxi
(2,542 posts)6. Would this be a Burden of Proof logical fallacy?
How far into never-never land does someone have to go to believe his neck stopped a bullet and saved the lives of how many behind him?
This fallacy originates from the Latin phrase "onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat". The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies (or questions) the claim. The fallacy of the Burden of Proof occurs when someone who is making a claim, puts the burden of proof on another party to disprove what they are claiming.
https://www.logicalfallacies.org/burden-of-proof.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I expect Trump to lean on Pope Leo, To make Charlie a saint, after all the pope is from Chicago and Trump hates Chicago
Walleye
Monday
#8
So as I thought, "prove me wrong" is bullshit. Charlie just wanted to start arguments
Walleye
Monday
#10
I'm sorry, but if God needs the likes of Charlie Kirk to bring people to him, I don't want anything to do with it
Walleye
Monday
#11
Matthew 7:15: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves."
Lonestarblue
Monday
#21
I'm sure there was no vest, none visible. No ricochet, just turbulence.
Bernardo de La Paz
Monday
#17
I have a really hard time believing a 30.06 round would not leave an exit wound if Kirk was struck directly in the neck.
sop
Monday
#45
A lot of people are nuts lately. Very sad. Its the internet, back when we did not hear all the comments. Now we hear
Srkdqltr
Monday
#27
There was no one behind him so a bullet leaving his body wouldn't have hurt anyone else.
intheflow
Monday
#37