Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,124 posts)
11. It's accurate enough.
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 09:11 PM
Sep 19

Note that 'insolvency' does not mean that it will pay out nothing.

'Insolvency' means it will not meet its financial obligations. And that part is true, once the trust fund is exhausted and it has to rely on current revenues.

I'd note that currently to collect full benefits depends on your year of birth. For decades it was a flat age 65 that met that requirement. I'd have to wait until 66 years 10 months, and if I don't wait then I will never (according to the way the law behind the entitlement reads) collect the fully amount.

That was also when the expectancy of life at 65 was far lower and far fewer of us made it to 65. Altering the benefits schedule was part of retaining solvency for this long.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A righteously enraged army of millions will nothing to lose C_U_L8R Sep 19 #1
You can bet their retirement Traildogbob Sep 19 #5
Kick dalton99a Sep 19 #2
Gen X dweller Sep 19 #3
Kick SheltieLover Sep 19 #4
Only them doing something that monumentally stupid could once again put Florida in play for Democrats Justice Brandeis Sep 19 #6
The first sentence is bullshit... lame54 Sep 19 #7
It's accurate enough. Igel Sep 19 #11
I always knew I'd never get a dime. Didn't AI solve this problem yet? bucolic_frolic Sep 19 #8
Tons of senior citizens are going to show up for the NO KINGS protest Oct 18th BigmanPigman Sep 19 #9
Obama tried to do something, but was bashed by his own party. So, here we are. Silent Type Sep 19 #10
The Catfood Commission "Grand Bargain"? Mad_Machine76 Sep 19 #12
Yeah, apparently some Dems weren't happy with increasing benefits for those on lower end of totem pole. Silent Type Sep 19 #16
So, markodochartaigh Sep 19 #13
Or, they could tax millionaires. usedtobedemgurl Sep 19 #14
That will never happen RainCaster Sep 20 #17
Fuck your Nazi laden "table", Murdering Asshole Thieves. Cha Sep 19 #15
"Ha ha suckers. All your retirement money are belong us. Ha ha." - G.O.P. Billionaire Bros BoRaGard Sep 20 #18
Nothing is going to get done before 2032. Captain Stern Sep 20 #19
Republicans have said its unsolvent since 1970s BS Blue Full Moon Sep 20 #20
The program was in trouble in the '70's. Captain Stern Sep 20 #21
All they have to do is raise the cap for deductions. The barista puts in the same amount as Elon Musk. Vinca Sep 20 #22
That would certainly help. Captain Stern Sep 20 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's social security c...»Reply #11