Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(1,639 posts)
12. Dishonestly trying to say it (i.e. if Soros didn't make a contribution) is very different from completely honestly using
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 04:37 PM
Sep 19

information that the NYT has put their name on. Facts do still matter at least a bit.

If any CA voter had any doubt in their mind whether this was purely political, the Reight will remove all doubt with the words "Soros, per the NYT".

I would guess that those ads will start immediately, and I fear we will see a concurrent reduction in support for it in the polls.

Since you think "the money is more important", I will be proven wrong if the polls in support for Prop 50 instead surge up after the Reight starts their media blitz, and if the Proposition passes.

I guess we'll see what happens. I hope I am 100% wrong and you are 100% right, for the record

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»10 mIl $ for Cali redistr...»Reply #12