Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopdiggin

(13,715 posts)
7. if it actually needs to be stated ...
Wed Apr 30, 2025, 01:09 PM
Apr 30

(here on DU) I think that arresting people at the courthouse is a totally sh*t move.
However, balanced by the fact that nobody has (to date) prohibited them from such action. (or specifically made it illegal) And (if memory serves) this is not the only occasion - or agency? - that has engaged in such tactics?

And then - the yet unresolved question - did the actions taken by the judge constitute a breaking of the law? Which you would probably grant as not a great look for a person on the bench? And (apparently) a point of view that higher court officials found persuasive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wisconsin Supreme Court s...»Reply #7