General Discussion

struggle4progress

(123,039 posts) Wed Apr 30, 2025, 12:39 AM Wednesday

Wisconsin Supreme Court suspends Milwaukee judge amid federal charges

Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan is suspended by the state Supreme Court following federal felony and misdemeanor charges.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wisconsin Supreme Court suspends Milwaukee judge amid federal charges (Original Post) struggle4progress Wednesday OP

I know it's probably required but JMCKUSICK Wednesday #1

... Dugan is scheduled for a May 15 preliminary hearing and possible arraignment struggle4progress Wednesday #2

thanks for the informative link stopdiggin Wednesday #3

what would be BETTER Skittles Wednesday #4

I'm sorry that the link/reporting here didn't meet up with your criteria. stopdiggin Wednesday #5

yeah OK Skittles Wednesday #6

if it actually needs to be stated ... stopdiggin Wednesday #7

JMCKUSICK

(2,119 posts)

1. I know it's probably required but

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 12:53 AM

Wednesday

damn.

struggle4progress

(123,039 posts)

2. ... Dugan is scheduled for a May 15 preliminary hearing and possible arraignment

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 12:56 AM

Wednesday

before Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries ...

What's next in Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan's case?
Tamia FowlkesTamia Fowlkes
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

stopdiggin

(13,639 posts)

3. thanks for the informative link

Reply to struggle4progress (Reply #2)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 02:15 AM

Wednesday

there's some detail here that I wasn't aware of. And - the more (solid ) reporting on the subject the better. Right?

Skittles

(163,850 posts)

4. what would be BETTER

Reply to stopdiggin (Reply #3)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 03:01 AM

Wednesday

is if there was MORE, WIDE (SOLID) REPORTING ON THESE FASCIST THUGS RUNNING AMERICA INTO THE FUCKING GROUND

stopdiggin

(13,639 posts)

5. I'm sorry that the link/reporting here didn't meet up with your criteria.

Reply to Skittles (Reply #4)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 03:33 AM

Wednesday

As I said in my post - I found information there that I wasn't (formerly) aware of. And, thus - advantageous.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Skittles

(163,850 posts)

6. yeah OK

Reply to stopdiggin (Reply #5)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 04:08 AM

Wednesday

what is OBVIOUS is repukes are trying to instill fear because THAT IS FASCISTS DO

over and OUT

stopdiggin

(13,639 posts)

7. if it actually needs to be stated ...

Reply to Skittles (Reply #6)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 01:09 PM

Wednesday

(here on DU) I think that arresting people at the courthouse is a totally sh*t move.
However, balanced by the fact that nobody has (to date) prohibited them from such action. (or specifically made it illegal) And (if memory serves) this is not the only occasion - or agency? - that has engaged in such tactics?

And then - the yet unresolved question - did the actions taken by the judge constitute a breaking of the law? Which you would probably grant as not a great look for a person on the bench? And (apparently) a point of view that higher court officials found persuasive.

Reply to this discussion