WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 05:43 PM
Original message |
Bernie Sanders, YES, President Obama, Not So Much |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. President Obama's policies are going to be the ones that create jobs. |
|
Bernie Sanders filibuster just says no to unemployment extensions and all the other tax proposals. "No" doesn't get us anywhere.
|
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Giving tax cuts to the rich does not create jobs. |
|
The Bush years are a testament to that.
|
katnapped
(938 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Some are still desperately extolling the values of being urinated on.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. The most efficient part of the agreement is unemployment extensions then the payroll cut |
|
Then the middle class tax cut.
The tax cuts for the rich are what you suffer through to get all the good stuff.
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. its called emptying the national treasury to make a few rich even richer |
|
increasing our national debt.
It does nothing to create jobs, the corporations have record profit but aren't adding jobs.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. So you want to get rid of the middle class tax cuts, the child tax credits, the |
|
Unemployment extensions and the expensing of capital purchases to contain the debt? Hey I think that helps my situation better in the long run but I was feeling really bad for the unemployed. But I guess some think that is an okay thing to do.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Including the increased withholding |
|
on those with incomes under $20-40K (single/family)?
Including the "poison pill" FICA tax holiday aimed at killing SS?
Including the lowering of estate taxes (after a holiday of zero ET)?
Helluva bargain for 13 months of UI that doesn't cover the long-term unemployed.
|
girl gone mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yay, more trickle down propaganda. |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. My sister and brother will spend every penny of that cut. |
|
I'll do my part but I'm not as efficient as they are.
And while tax cuts aren't very efficient they still contribute somewhat to growth in a consumption economy.
No, they aren't getting the top cuts, they will be benefiting most from the payroll tax cut as will I.
And yes, the growing of the deficit sucks, but since we need the growth it is what it is.
|
katnapped
(938 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Give the angry masses a couple of stale candy bars and tell them to shaddup.
|
AndrewP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yeah, but I'm going to get another $200 next year!!! |
|
I won't have any Social Security when I get old, but I'll be able to go to an NFL game every year! I'm sold!
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. yes, a few crumbs for alot of debt that we have to pay for |
|
thats what we're paying for.
Its not like these tax cuts are free.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
19. it's worked mighty fine for the thugs |
silver10
(492 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
9. This is what Reagan did, what Bush did... |
|
and what Obama is now doing - decreasing tax cuts for the wealthy - who have not suffered, actually, they probably grew more prosperous - while decreasing social programs. They are not paying their share, and we need their money to decrease the deficit and stimulate the economy. The government, through various NEEDED programs, services, research and development, contracts, etc. DOES create jobs (or should).
I also don't think paying 2% less into Social Security is really helping - in the end, it will also help the repuke cause of undermining that safety net program, which they absolutely despise.
In the end, the extended unemployed do win, but I wonder how many of them voted repuke? Anyway, it's a sweet deal for the repugs.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. It's not actually paying 2% less. It's 32% less. |
|
The proposed cut is from a rate of 6.2% to 4.2%. It may never be reinstated; it's the poison pill for SS.
|
silver10
(492 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Thank you for clarifying. |
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Poor Dennis Kucinich. |
|
Tossed aside and practically forgotten.:(
|
Gin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Bernie was just on CNN and fired up....even got the panel to agree |
NorthCarolina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-11-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Poke all the fun you want, but I certainly haven't forgotten about him. |
|
This battle however is going to be conducted in the Senate. Kucinich is a member of the House.
|
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Aug 23rd 2025, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |