1st WikiLeaks, next? NYT? DU? HuffPost?

:shrug:

Edit: How could I forget Michael Moore?

:P

paranoia and yours.

:crazy:

...and their accusations that websites like Democratic Underground, Daily Kos, Huffington Post all support the enemy and put American lives in danger. These are lawmakers, not bloggers or your FOX News buddies making these accusations. Sure it's a stretch but not impossible giving how more and more of our civil liberties get taken away every day while you like to make smart-ass comments about them.

They do that to give a bit of red meat to their crazy base. They did it from Sept 11 2001 onwards, and yet, somehow, DU was not proscribed in that period.

Will that make you and the other crybabies happy? :cry:

You're the one panicking that Something Horrible is about to happen to organisations and websites. At least, that's what you seem to mean in this thread. The OP just lists Wikileaks as 'first'. Assuming you weren't ranking your favourite websites, then let's look at what has happened to an organisation that has literally been targeted by the American government - Al Jazeera. While that's happened, they've opened up an English language channel, which can easily be watched all over the USA, on the net. And on a few TVS too, I understand. So, all the fuming about it by lawmakers as being an 'enemy' has had no effect whatsoever. It suffered by the unofficial bombing of it by the Bush admin in warzones. And, you know, DU, Huffington Post, the New York Times and Wikileaks aren't actually located in warzones.

I thought that was Dick Cheney's job.

So, if I post one here, yes, I'm posting state secrets. :)

Revealed: US State Dept. republished WikiLeaks document from Feb 2009

Is viewing and republishing documents from WikiLeaks illegal, or isn't it? Apparently not even the US State Department knows.

America's top diplomatic agency republished a document leaked by the secrets outlet, which the site revealed today via Twitter.

"State department republishes Wikileaks' doc," they wrote on their Twitter page. "Will they now try to sue themselves?"

The document (.pdf) is a congressional report on US trade policy in the Caribbean. The report was published in January 2009 and was released by WikiLeaks on February 2, 2009, along with 6,780 other congressional reports.

It was unclear when the US State Dept. published the document, which resided on its .gov domain.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/state-department-republishes-document-wikileaks/

:hi:

so that the commentariat would think they were all crazy conspiracy theories...

Cause it seems to make me one around here when I don't like every single action and thing our govt does and I call em on it...

During the Bush term many websites were accused by right-wing lawmakers (LAWMAKERS) of aiding the enemy and putting American soldiers lives at risk.

Keep up the good work. I've rec'd a few of your posts :thumbsup:

when he was reporting the story of Special Forces in Pakistan.

So, it's already happening in a lower key but the presstitutes don't report it, of course.

here: http://wikileaks.indymedia.org/

(not to be left out ;) - but just a dns pointer, so far, so I'm told).

now that they know how much trouble it will get them from the government.

Except maybe Moore of course.

Just going out on a limb here, but I don't think he's in the business of providing a platform for stolen intel.

The stolen classified documents were a convenient excuse and/or reason to basically shut the guy up and let us and the rest of the world go back to being told how great the US is and can do no wrong.