Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:14 AM
Original message |
Woo. Obama got 2 1/2 times MORE for US than them!! |
|
It will probably amount to an electric bill or a couple of tanks of gas. Go US! You want to REALLY spread the wealth? Give every taxpayer the SAME chunk of money across the board--$50k or so, and let US stimulate the economy.
But please...don't keep shitting and trying to sell it to me as applesauce.
I'll give up my 2 1/2 times MORE to get one of the rich tax cuts every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
|
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. 50K would come in handy.... |
Travis_0004
(417 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message |
2. They say its going to cost 700 billion right |
|
700 billion divided by 300 million people=2333. A nice chunk of change, but nowhere near 50k.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Cut out the wealthy, and children and its quite a large sum |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Their tax cuts are substantial. Ours are a pittance. If we are going to bankrupt our children and grandchildren--let's at least make it an amount that will HELP people.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Wow. You have great ideas! |
|
How much would that cost? Do you know? Can we get that done by January 1st? If so that's cool!
Have you talked to anyone about this proposal of yours yet?
|
Norrin Radd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
14. Is this your way of skirting the rules regarding |
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
5. And that Federal withholding tax holiday.... |
|
will all but assure the demise of SS. For those of us at an age where there is little hope of recouping lost retirement funds from the various stock market downturns, this is agonizing. How can Obama be so stupid as to give them the ammunition they will need to dismantle social security? I remain absolutely aghast.
|
somone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Sowing the seed of death and destruction for millions of seniors |
|
but I suppose they're not his base anymore
|
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
6. actually Obama prevented... |
|
my taxes going up 50% YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS....LOVE THAT MAN! Thank you Obama.....
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Yeah I had a conversation with someone who felt like you |
|
They could care less that the lowest tax bracket was going to see an increase in THEIR taxes, they could care less that it laid out the demise for SS, and they could care less that our children and grandchildren would be bankrupted by these tax cuts for the rich. They got theirs. Fuck everyone else. I don't understand that mentality. But that is the first rule of the jungle, isn't it?
|
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. the 10% tax bracket staying at 10%... |
|
has nothing to do with the demise of SS or increasing the deficit in a substantial way. Not sure if you have any idea how many people would be completely ruined if their taxes go up 50%....I am one of the people who would be hurt the most if this tax deal does not go through....there are way too many people like me, Obama knows this and is putting his political life on the line for us....I respect that....that is a leader and a fighter!
|
Rincewind
(682 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
he only prevented mine from going up 33%. And, keeping the extended unemployment benefits will let my younger brother, and his wife and youngest son keep their house. I don't know how much Obama will save my older brother, probably $800 to $1000, but you need to understand that we don't count. The only important thing is that the rich pay more taxes, if we have to lose everything we have to insure that, that is an acceptable loss, to other people.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message |
10. You know, that 50K really isn't a bad idea. |
|
It wouldn't even need to be that much. Alaska's economy booms every October when we get our Permanent Fund Dividend checks. It's usually only around $1200 or $1300, but every man, woman and child who's established a one-year residency gets the check. People can do with it what they will. Some people save it, some spend it on drugs, some drink it up, many people go on vacations or buy new gadgets for their house or perform needed repairs on their car. They buy new clothes or Christmas presents. It's really a wonderful thing.
It's too bad the United States hasn't set up some kind of Permanent Fund for the national citizens. Alaska's Fund is based on resource extraction, so we make money off of the oil companies' profits. Couldn't the United States make the same kind of money off of many other major international corporations and set up investments and dividends for the people who make these corporations possible and profitable? It shouldn't all be for the corporations.
I guess it sounds too much like socialism, but it works great in Alaska.
|
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
...the Bush tax cuts got us here in the first place. Two more years of Bush tax cuts means two additional years before we get out of this mess, and two extra years of unemployment.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. I am not an economist |
|
but my expectation is that it is exponential. Two more years will not just add two more years...it will add anywhere from 10-20 years.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-10-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Yeah. Wait 'til the diarrhea hits... |
|
and tell us how lucky we are.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Aug 22nd 2025, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |