zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:23 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Which vote with the Republicans by Dennis Kucinich was the most disgusting? |
|
Kucinich may think his vote shouldn't represent his constituents or that voting against Obama is a "good thing", but which vote showed Kucinich to obviously be a phony demagogue blowhard that never gets anything accomplished and blathers on like a Utopian Purist while actually voting like a Republican?
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message |
1. So this dude has a pattern of picking the perfect over the good, he should have lost credibility.. |
GreenArrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Actually, his pattern is picking the good |
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yes he is a Hero for his votes, and the other dems that vote the same way are just Rahm's whores |
|
You people are unfucking real
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
21. Lieberman bad. Kucinich good. Blue Dogs bad. Kucinich good. |
|
So what if they vote the same way...
:crazy:
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I didn't know he did this more than once. Why are so many people anti Lieberman? |
|
It's an almost similar pattern for two different extremes.
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Bingo! Kucinich is just as much of an asshat as Lieberman is |
|
Look at the votes. That's what counts.
While I like Kucinich on some levels, he is clearly showing himself to be a strawman than an authentic Progressive.
|
chelsea0011
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
5. It's fine that Kucinich has beliefs that he holds dear to his heart, but |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 10:35 AM by chelsea0011
he is also a Democrat. He picked a party to run with and sometimes you have to follow the party. If he wants to be an Independant, run as one. If he wants to ba a republican, run as one. You picked this party for a reason. So what is the reason?
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd love to see the UnRec cowards tell me why Kucinich is good for the Democratic Party |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 10:43 AM by zulchzulu
F*&king wankers...
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
39. Meh nothin wrong with unrecing |
|
not that I unreced this cause you know I didnt. But I do unrec stuff here all the time, sometimes I'll comment sometimes the thread is just so absurd its just not worth responding to an unrec is enough.
in the case of this thread well... is there really any question who is unrecing this?
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
47. I didn't unrec, but I should after your whining about it. |
|
DK brings a voice to the Party that is needed, just as all the others do. We don't march in lockstep, and each voice brings something to our big tent. If you can't see why the numerous things he speaks out about are important, both to the party and the country, whether you're in agreement or disagreement with him, I'm not sure what to say to you. :shrug:
|
NCarolinawoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Insurance company stock is going up this morning. |
|
I just watched the analysis on CNBC. They are calling this a "benign" bill. They say the health care providers are happy with this. Nothing in it to lower their profits, plus increased enrollment. They are recommending people buy the private health care stock.
They all appeared to be happy and relaxed. They don't think the issue of health care will be addressed for another ten years.
My conclusion is that Dennis is a like a voice of truth, crying in the wilderness.
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. So a "voice of truth" votes against people who are denied coverage due to... |
|
...pre-existing conditions?
Wow. That's a fucking laugh. Lieberman and Kucinich are cut from the same cloth. They are both cowards.
:puke:
|
NCarolinawoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Can you address the first part of what I posted? |
|
How do you feel about the insurance companies continuing to raise their rates?
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Well gee whiz. So the insurance companies are raising their rates? |
|
Why would the insurance companies raise their rates? Maybe it has to do with the fact that: - They have been raising their rates by 10+% every year for over 20 years
- They want to raise the rates as much now before they won't be allowed to with the healthcare reform legislation, which kicks in a couple years
- They are greedy and that's why people who voted FOR healthcare reform want to make them stop being greedy
Dennis voted WITH the insurance companies by voting against reform. He voted WITH the insurance companies that want to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.
Know your enemy. Sometimes they smile at you while they stab you in the back.
|
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. What do you think of health insurance stock prices vs. the S&P 500 |
|
for the last year or two? How would you explain the difference?
|
ccharles000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
SIMPLYB1980
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
12. DK "Better for the repbulicans than any Blue Dog." |
spoony
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
13. I see what's happening here |
|
You see all the threads another poster is starting about DK and you're worried about him stealing your rep, so you're trying to make up ground.
|
SIMPLYB1980
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Not a single person on the planet fears anything DK |
|
and his supporters have to say. How much you want to bet he will vote for the final bill? Will you call DK a corporate whore then?
|
spoony
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. I think you may have replied to the wrong person. |
|
Because I have no idea what you're on about.
|
SIMPLYB1980
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
And you are a fool if you have no idea what I said.
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. If you vote the same way as a corporate whore, you are a corporate whore |
|
I don't care about the blather and chest beating. If you vote like a Repig, you may as well be a Repig.
You can't see that?
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
31. The amount of blowback suggests otherwise. |
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. Explain to me why Kucinich is a "good Democrat" by voting against what we need to do |
|
I don't give a poodle's patootie about threads. I care that people diss asshats like Lieberman but somehow our Precious Dennis is to be adored even though he is just as idiotic as Lieberman AND votes like a Republican.
Tell me how voting like a Blue Dog and acting like Lieberman is a good thing.
|
Milo_Bloom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
33. Because he is voting like a PROGRESSIVE |
|
And the bills you mentioned are clearly NOT progressive.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
duck, quacks like a duck, then we're suppose to believe it's an eagle?
|
Undercurrent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Heck, I was still trying to figure out why |
|
he voted No on a nationwide AMBER alert system for missing kids back in 2003.
|
firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. Oh my! no excuse. n/t |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
51. Standing on his stupid principles? Whatever they are. |
firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
23. Add to that, the vote against the disciplinary amendment on the |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 11:33 AM by firedupdem
Joe Wilson issue. May seem minor, but that vote told me all I needed to know about this guy.
|
SIMPLYB1980
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
32. That was because he was guilty of the same thing Wilson did. |
|
He just didn't do it in a joint session of congress with the President making the speech. But he got the same treatment so he didn't think it was fair.
|
liquid diamond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
55. I laughed at people that |
|
deified this asshole over the years, but looking at his record really makes me hate him. DK is a fucking fraud.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
25. HIS VOTE AGINST THE IRAK WAR RELLY PISSED ME OFF !1111!!!! |
|
GOD DAM COMMIE KUSSINNER DONT BELIEVE IN KILLIN BROWN PEOPLE FOR OIL. THAT'S JUST UNAMURIKKKAN!11!1!!111! :crazy:
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day |
|
Yeah, he voted against the war. Big Fucking Deal.
We're talking about his votes NOW.
|
spiritual_gunfighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Kicking more liberals out of the party everyday. Way to go n/t |
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Are you a liberal if you vote like a Republican? |
|
Tell me we haven't gone down this road...
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
35. Tell us what part of this is voting like a Republican? |
|
Rated 64% by the ACLU, indicating a mixed civil rights voting record. Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. Rated 94% by the NAACP, indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance. Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. Rated 80% by CURE, indicating pro-rehabilitation crime votes. Rated +10 by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. Rated 90% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes. Rated 100% by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence. Rated 100% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection Rated 85% by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes. Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. Rated 100% by SANE, indicating a pro-peace voting record. Rated 100% by the AFL-CIO, indicating a pro-union voting record. Rated 92% by the AU, indicating support of church-state separation. Rated 100% by the ARA, indicating a pro-senior voting record. Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.
What's your definition of liberal? :shrug:
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
40. The no on healthcare part |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
43. And what about the rest? Does that vote negate the other things? |
|
And do you really want to go down the road of taking one or two votes and holding them against someone despite a solid record otherwise, because that's a chump's game that can go against any Democrat. Sure you want to play that game? Ted Kennedy and NCLB ring a bell? Almost every Democrat on the IWR ring a bell? Tell me, what pure Democrat do you support that has never voted in a way you don't like?
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 01:41 AM by Egnever
We all draw the line somewhere, For me with Dennis this was the straw that broke the camels back. I have never really been a huge fan of his though at times I do agree with him. I have never thought of him as an effective representative.
Ted Kennedy may have had some bad votes but he also got things accomplished. I see a huge difference between someone who makes some bad votes and gets other things done and someone who makes bad votes and gets nothing done. Don't you? Its easy to constantly scream for nirvana the hard part is actually moving towards it.
As far as the IWR vote thing goes thats a vote that for me was a deal breaker. I have not supported any politician that voted for it. Almost the whole dem primary field was eliminated for me by that single vote. I wouldn't vote republican because of it as they are clearly worse but I wont lift a finger ever to help anyone get elected who voted for it either.
I am coming to the conclusion very quickly this health care vote will be another litmus test for me. Dennis failed that test spectacularly and his statements since have only made it worse.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |
27. This is why Kucinich would never get anything done as president. He isn't like Ted Kennedy |
|
and get legislation passed.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
46. I like DK a lot, but the difference in effectiveness between those two is vast. |
|
But to be fair, no Democrat can really match up well to Teddy's accomplishments.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
30. At least most Blue Dogs voted WITH the party on at least one of those |
|
which makes Kucinich another Lieberman, IMO.
|
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Kick for the Dennisocalypse |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
36. But, history is being made without |
|
dennis kucinich and his club for stagnation.
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
37. Besides healthcare, the one where he sided with Joe Wilson |
|
I was done with him for good when that happened.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
44. I'm sure you were ever for him. |
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #44 |
50. He was my pick for President (04) before I switched to Dean |
|
So yes, I was for him. Over time, I learned more about him and he lost my trust.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
52. Ok, that's fair enough. |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think it's OK to call him a grandstander.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
45. Claiming to be a fierce advocate for something to get votes is a good example of grandstanding also. |
burning rain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |
42. I haven't cared for the guy since the '90s,... |
|
when he opposed military intervention in the former Yugo--effectively pandering to the Serbs.
|
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |
48. he's just very principled, that's all |
|
for example, he always voted against abortion.
until he stopped opposing it while running for president. :eyes:
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message |
49. Geez, he's as reliable as a Republican on the important votes. |
Flaneur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message |
54. Yeah, I'd rather have a reliable Dem like Bart Stupak representing me. |
Onlooker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 05:44 AM
Response to Original message |
56. Ops logic is the same logic that got us Don't Ask/Don't Tell |
|
There are times to stand on principle. While I'm glad the health care bill passed, I'm also glad that Kucinich voted the way he did. It's an important reminder to the House leadership and corporate Obama that some liberals are as principled as conservatives, and one should not automatically assume that liberals are spineless like those the Op seems to admire. Don't Ask/Don't Tell was the lousy "compromise" that set back gay civil rights. Denying a woman equal rights in medical care (by denying her decision making power over her own body) is an equally bad compromise. My hope is that by getting any kind of bill passed, the Democrats will hold onto to power and change the the law.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Aug 01st 2025, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message |