Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

39 Nay votes!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't believe this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:14 PM
Original message
39 Nay votes!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't believe this
Please tell me Obama is not going to take this. Its time for a little party cleansing.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That sounds rather wrong....however...I hope Obama sicks Rahm on them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Rahm? The guy that put all of these blue dogs in place nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The ones who voted "no" are the ones Rahm recruited to run as Demopublicans
My opinion is Obama should can this asshole right now but I trust him to do what needs to be done at the right time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Rahm is likely friends with the ones who voted NO.
He's the one who recruited most of the Blue Dogs into the DCCC. Rahm is not really a good friend to the progressive.

Obama could have made a better choice with Rahm.

And Geitner. And... etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Would love to have that list
Way too many on such a big vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Does anyone have the list yet?
I'd like to see if my congressman was among the 39. Heaven help him if he is. He is an Illinoisan: land of Obama, Rahm, Durbin, and me. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. leave the party cleansing to the Repukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep......
.... we can either have a Blue Dog who won't always vote our way, or we can have a Republican who'll take our gavel and committee chairs from us ..... I'll take the former.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. These were protection votes for Dems in conservative districts
That's the reality of politics. These were likely agreed to and negotiated by Pelosi et al prior to the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes, its politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Amazing, isn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's theater.
Pelosi got the votes she needed, and that's all she needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Grow up
You get the votes you need, then release anyone for whom the vote may present election issues. That's how it works on any controversial bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 30th 2025, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC