HCR House Debate: Catholics for Choice Say Stupak Amendment "Unconscionable," Stupak SmirksSo the US Conference of Catholic Bishops care more about preventing women from having access to abortion--which is still legal, btw--than about providing healthcare access to millions and millions of the uninsured.
Catholics for Choice don't agree:
Jon O’Brien, president of Catholics for Choice, said:
"This is unconscionable. This tiny group of individuals has decided that their personal beliefs about abortion are more important than insuring millions of Americans who do not currently have coverage.
"We urge members of the House of Representatives to vote against the antichoice amendment. It is bad for American women and wrong for Congress to be deciding which procedures are covered and which are not.
"Catholics support healthcare reform and support coverage for reproductive healthcare services in that reform. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has been on Capitol Hill claiming to speak for America’s Catholics. They do not do so with any legitimacy. Poll after poll has shown that the American public, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, does not want to see Congress play politics with women’s healthcare.
"American Catholics will not forget who held their healthcare hostage, and allowed it to be held hostage, when the elections come around in 2010."
Meanwhile, Bart Stupak crows over how he got his way with nothing more than a bluff."
Meanwhile back at DU those of us who question why this amendment was allowed are being lectured to get on board.