|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
TomCADem
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:58 AM Original message |
NY Times - "Obama Strategy on Health Legislation Appears to Pay Off" |
Refresh | +20 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
uponit7771
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm starting to beleive some DU posters are from FAUX\WSJ, they spout GOP talking points to the T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TomCADem
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I Think It Is Pretty Brave Of The Author Not To Recite The Corporate Media Narrative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:26 AM Original message |
it's all a part of their ultimate goal - which is to chip away gradually at Obama's popularity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. This is exactly what I've bee saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. WHAT "public option?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thunder rising
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:26 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. However, no caps, no preexisting conditions and no rescission. Those are biggies for corp insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I don't trust these insurance companies to obey the new regulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
avaistheone1
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I have no reason to trust the insurance companies either. You watch they will work all of this to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ProleNoMore
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. How Can The 2% Public Option Be Considered A Success For Any Except Insurers And Wall Street? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. damn, another one I gotta put in the iggy box |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ProleNoMore
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. With Pride - Independent Thinkers Worldwide Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. They're coming back faster too, lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HopeOverFear
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. LOL yeah they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:37 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. its can't. simple as that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Better question. Why are the insurance companies fighting everything in the bill, not just the PO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. I suppose we can see it as a foot in the door - or a toe maybe. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
10. The OP/nyt article is speaking of WH strategy, NOT of a strong, robust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. The proposed regulations outside of the PO make it way more affordable... inconvenient fact for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
16. Kick. "For the race is not to the swift." NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yep, appears so. Some of us had confidence, didn't waiver. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
optimator
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. "appears to pay off" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Deleted message |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
23. Phucktard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Is that your nickname? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
timeforpeace
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. They didn't really use the words "strategy" and "health legislation" together, did they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
26. Robert Pear and Sheryl Gay Stolberg have already been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Aug 24th 2025, 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC