Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Administration: Toss Wiretap Lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 07:05 AM
Original message
Obama Administration: Toss Wiretap Lawsuit
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do we need state secrets privilege to investigate illegal wire tapping?
Holder's effort to stop the lawsuit marks the first time the administration has tried to invoke the state secrets privilege under a new policy it launched last month designed to make such a legal argument more difficult. So why does this legal argument need to be made more difficult?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have no idea.
Edited on Sat Oct-31-09 07:25 AM by cornermouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seems as though they're saying the judge will make the determination
on the evidence, not just a blanket request from the Administration.

:shrug:

Holder said U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, who is handling the case, was given a classified description of why the case must be dismissed so that the court can "conduct its own independent assessment of our claim."

The attorney general said the judge would decide whether the administration had made a valid claim and "we will respect the outcome of that process."

That is a departure from the Bush administration, which resisted providing specifics to judges handling such cases about what the national security concerns were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Aug 25th 2025, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC