Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raine1967

(11,653 posts)
3. I wish I could disagree, but by all evidence, I agree.
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 07:56 PM
Aug 2015

I don't mind having fewer debates than we had in 2008. What I don't like is the rigidity of the rules and the lack of wiggle room.

Having said that, I was not fond of the Sanders suggestion to debate the GOP as a nominee.

This article was posted in GDP, and I am really not fond that DWS took a play from the GOP.

So this cycle, determined to put a lid on the process, Democrats took an idea from the Republicans, who had announced there would be penalties on their candidates if they went outside the Republican National Committee’s sanctioned debates. If Sanders or O’Malley tries to test the DNC, they would risk getting aced out of the other debates. Ditto for a media outlet that tried to mount something separate on the side, as they would risk losing Hillary Clinton as a contender.

One thing is sure, Clinton is going to follow the rules; she won’t do more than the six debates. And the networks understand the DNC has control of the process because Hillary is on board with the plan and she’s not going to show up for any debates that are not sanctioned.

Forums are allowed because they’re more of a cattle call. All five Democratic candidates will be speaking at the DNC summer meeting in Minneapolis on August 28th, but they won’t be sharing a stage.

The DNC will also announce this week uniform criteria for inclusion in the debates. Democrats aren’t concerned about the number of candidates as they don’t have that many. But they want to head off what happened in ’07 and ’08, when debate hosts changed the rules from debate to debate.

The result was former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel, the first in the field to announce for president, being allowed into several debates. He quickly achieved notoriety for his anti-war position and curmudgeonly demeanor. Then, after failing to exceed 1 percent in the polls, he was barred from debating.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/03/dems-to-set-debate-schedule-this-week.html

The entire article is worth a read. I suspect that O'MAlley read it as well.











Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»Martin O'Malley accuses D...»Reply #3