Please forgive my simpleminded question [View all]

(it's the best my simple mind can come up with), but how you can fight Big Money with Big Money?

It seems that Big Money wins either way, because the only candidates who can win in this model are the ones whose policies are sufficiently acceptable to Big Money.

Here is Tweedle Dee, who supports TPP, Keystone, corporate and bank deregulation, Middle Eastern wars, gay rights, gun control, and right to choice.

Mr. Dee is running against Mr. Tweedle Dum, who supports TPP, Keystone, corporate and bank deregulation, DOMA, MIddle Eastern wars, concealed carry of howitzers, and Right to Life (from conception to birth, anyway.)

Big Money doesn't give a shit about gay rights, abortion, or, for the most part, gun control. Both candidates support the positions they do care about--positions that will ultimately lead to ruin.