Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
19. I said nothing about "my" solution
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 04:58 PM
Apr 2015

You asked about the prospects for a Teachout campaign against Schumer. I did some volunteer work for Teachout and I know something about New York politics, so I gave you my response about Schumer's situation.

That Schumer faces no serious danger means that neither Teachout nor anyone else should run against him with the expectation of winning. That doesn't end the inquiry, though. I supported Teachout against Cuomo even though I knew she had no serious expectation of winning.

Teachout did at least draw some attention to her issues. I don't know whether a primary challenger to Schumer would have the same effect. The media may have given Teachout some coverage because of Cuomo's perceived weakness. In 2006, when Hillary Clinton ran for re-election, she also had an underfunded progressive challenger, labor activist Jonathan Tasini. She refused to debate him and completely ignored him. The corporate media didn't pay nearly as much attention to Tasini as they did last year to Teachout. I suspect that a challenger to Schumer would fall more into the Tasini than Teachout category. That doesn't mean we must give Schumer a free pass, but it is a factor to take into account.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't pay attention to what they say.... daleanime Apr 2015 #1
Exactly. RiverLover Apr 2015 #2
^this x 100 GoneFishin Apr 2015 #3
k & r. Thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #4
Populists need to take back the Democratic party, that's for sure. PatrickforO Apr 2015 #5
Is Zephyr Teachout aspirant Apr 2015 #6
I think she had a campaign but LiberalElite Apr 2015 #9
Yes, and, more to the point, Schumer doesn't have Cuomo's negatives Jim Lane Apr 2015 #16
So your solution aspirant Apr 2015 #17
I said nothing about "my" solution Jim Lane Apr 2015 #19
2006 = 2016 Okay aspirant Apr 2015 #20
Sorry, I'm done here. Jim Lane Apr 2015 #23
I'm trying to figure out aspirant Apr 2015 #24
My memory aspirant Apr 2015 #18
If not, she should. She gave Cuomo a serious challenge, even as a virtual unknown with sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #27
It makes me physically ill to see a D beside Andrew Cuomo, Rahm Emanuel and the rest. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #7
Oh, here is a quote from a weird (IMO) OP on GD that is all a-flutter because Franken and Sanders djean111 Apr 2015 #8
hope so, but Cuomo's ed deal got passedt, Obama will sign TPP, Hillary will be the nominee, Doctor_J Apr 2015 #10
Ok wow, that puts it in perspective. RiverLover Apr 2015 #11
That's a lovely example of "Must vote for the D no matter what" jeff47 Apr 2015 #13
You are cherry picking Doctor_J Apr 2015 #22
Not quite jeff47 Apr 2015 #25
you've gone from cherry picking to lying Doctor_J Apr 2015 #26
And don't forget NJ, another Blue State where the Dem Party itself endorsed the Republican. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #28
My intense involvement with politics taught me this: Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #29
Schumer was not at all a surprise. Nor in any danger of not becoming the next leader. jeff47 Apr 2015 #12
I had thought Durbin would contest the post. Jim Lane Apr 2015 #14
Schumer lined up more support back then, and thus has more support today. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2015 #15
Along with the neoliberal Wall Streeters, what about DWS & the DNC chair? People who aren't appalachiablue Apr 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Wall Street Democrats are...»Reply #19