Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

Showing Original Post only (View all)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 12:11 AM Jan 2015

As Top Democrats Embrace a Robin Hood Tax, It’s Time for Activists to Go Big [View all]

http://www.thenation.com/blog/194673/top-democrats-embrace-robin-hood-tax-its-time-activists-go-big

With backing from House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California, Maryland Congressman Chris Van Hollen moved Monday to present an “action plan” that is designed to frame the Democratic message in the new Congress. At the heart of it is a proposal to address the rapid redistribution of wealth upward in the United States with a small tax on high-volume stock trades and a new initiative to aid working-class individuals and families.

“This is a plan to help tackle the challenge of our times,” declared Van Hollen, a key figure in the House Democratic Caucus and a particularly influential voice in debates on economic policy. “We want a growing economy that works for all Americans, not just the wealthy few.”

The “action plan” calls for a 0.1 percent tax on transactions by high-volume traders—Wall Street’s “high rollers”—that would yield an anticipated $800 billion in fresh revenues over a decade. Reductions in tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans would yield another $400 billion. The combined $1.2 billion windfall would, according to a Washington Post review of the plan, help to fund “a ‘paycheck bonus’ of $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for married couples, a bonus of $250 for people who save at least $500 a year and reduced ‘marriage penalties’ for couples.”

While the numbers may sound big, what Van Hollen has proposed is a modest plan that only begins to explore the potential of a financial transactions tax. The 0.1 percent tax on trades is far below what unions and activist groups have proposed. For instance, Ellison’s 2013 proposal called for a 0.5 percent tax rate on stock trades, along with a 0.1 percent tax rate on bonds and a 0.005 percent tax rate on derivatives or other investments.

Of course, any proposal for taxing the wealthiest Americans faces daunting odds in a Congress now wholly controlled by Wall Street–aligned Republicans such as Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Ways and Means Committee chair Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin. Ryan can, in particular, be counted on to use his powerful new position to defend the financial interests that have so generously supported his campaigns.
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It would be better to fix the Reverse-Robinhood taxes that already exist Demeter Jan 2015 #1
will the editor please pick up the white courtesy phone Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #2
Pretty Convenient colsohlibgal Jan 2015 #3
I feel the same. I want to see something real, not just more campaign bullshit that's ND-Dem Jan 2015 #4
Got an alternative, given that the Repubs control Congress entirely? n/t eridani Jan 2015 #8
Yeah, How about a LIVING WAGE? Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #16
It's a shame aspirant Jan 2015 #5
Not far enough Half-Century Man Jan 2015 #6
How about taxing the wealthy at the same rate everyone else is taxed? Eg, any Corporation that sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #7
Corporations are people, my friend. GeorgeGist Jan 2015 #11
HEY! Now that's a novel idea! Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #20
If one is another, isn't the other the same one? aspirant Jan 2015 #22
^^^^^^^^^ YES YES TO ALL ABOVE newfie11 Jan 2015 #13
"But we all know it will never happen" demwing Jan 2015 #15
I hope your right newfie11 Jan 2015 #23
Maybe once we get rid of the 3rd-Way! Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #17
Than that has to be the main goal imo. To replace them, one at a time if necessary, sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #24
Worked with the blue dogs. Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #25
this is a wonderful idea redruddyred Jan 2015 #9
A wonderful idea? Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #21
The "Democratic message" being "framed" is "Now that we have no power we are going to ... Scuba Jan 2015 #10
Are those ideas even Populist? Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #18
This begs the question: Martin Eden Jan 2015 #12
Because they have no moral center demwing Jan 2015 #14
+1 Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #19
OK activists... who's ready to GO BIG! Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #26
"Ellison's 2013 proposal" aspirant Jan 2015 #27
Keith Ellison is on the House Financial Services Committee Cosmic Kitten Jan 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»As Top Democrats Embrace ...»Reply #0